Re: [LARTC] Bandwith thinking error

2004-05-13 Thread Lars Oeschey
Jason Boxman wrote: I imagine you set $DEV to ethX, right? (In the original script it was ppp0.) yep... <>You'll need to patch your kernel to use either one and they both have IPTables components you will need to use to match traffic. IPP2P needs CONNMARK, which is available in patch-o-mati

Re: [LARTC] Bandwith thinking error

2004-05-13 Thread Jason Boxman
On Thursday 13 May 2004 14:59, Lars Oeschey wrote: > Andreas Klauer wrote: > >The modified wondershaper is here: > >http://www.metamorpher.de/files/wshaper-over-lan.htb > > I tested the script now, it works good so far in that LAN traffic isn't > slowed down anymore . But when p2p has full Band

Re: [LARTC] Bandwith thinking error

2004-05-13 Thread Andreas Klauer
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 20:59 schrieb Lars Oeschey: > Andreas Klauer wrote: > >The modified wondershaper is here: > >http://www.metamorpher.de/files/wshaper-over-lan.htb > > I would like that p2p just gets the bandwidth thats > left over after http, is that possible? It's hard to get the P2P s

Re: [LARTC] Bandwith thinking error

2004-05-13 Thread Lars Oeschey
Andreas Klauer wrote: The modified wondershaper is here: http://www.metamorpher.de/files/wshaper-over-lan.htb I tested the script now, it works good so far in that LAN traffic isn't slowed down anymore . But when p2p has full Bandwidth, http over the proxy is very slow. I would like that p

Re: [LARTC] Bandwith thinking error

2004-05-13 Thread Andreas Klauer
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 15:48 schrieb Lars Oeschey: > err, not really, it's just that http/mail etc. wins over p2p ;) If you want to detect P2P traffic, have a look into this: http://rnvs.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/ipp2p/index_en.html My Fair NAT script supports it. It works well for me. :-) HTH

Re: [LARTC] Bandwith thinking error

2004-05-13 Thread Lars Oeschey
> Am Thursday 13 May 2004 09:06 schrieb Lars Oeschey: > Read in the LARTC Howto (www.lartc.org) about it. just did ;) >> There's just me and my wife, > You need shaping so badly if there are only two users? err, not really, it's just that http/mail etc. wins over p2p ;) > If you want every t

Re: [LARTC] Bandwith thinking error

2004-05-13 Thread Andreas Klauer
Am Thursday 13 May 2004 09:06 schrieb Lars Oeschey: > err, what's ingress? Read in the LARTC Howto (www.lartc.org) about it. Wondershaper does it for limiting incoming traffic. The real classful shaping can only be done for outgoing traffic. (Well, probably unless you're using IMQ, but Wondershap

Re: [LARTC] Bandwith thinking error

2004-05-13 Thread Lars Oeschey
> You have to add your filters then to the DSL class instead of > parent qdisc, and a filter in the parent qdisc that puts packets > that go to the Router IP into the DSL class. Or modify your filters > so that they only apply to Router packets. Especially if you're > using ingress, you have to

Re: [LARTC] Bandwith thinking error

2004-05-12 Thread Andreas Klauer
Am Wednesday 12 May 2004 16:08 schrieb Lars Oeschey: > I found that I had some thinking error with the wshaper script. I > assigned the bandwith of my DSL connection to it, but the machine where > it runs is normally connected to the LAN with 100Mbit behind a separate > Hardware-Router. WShaper r

[LARTC] Bandwith thinking error

2004-05-12 Thread Lars Oeschey
Hi, I found that I had some thinking error with the wshaper script. I assigned the bandwith of my DSL connection to it, but the machine where it runs is normally connected to the LAN with 100Mbit behind a separate Hardware-Router.Obviously, the complete connection of the machine was slowed down to