Re: [LARTC] CBQ-wondershaper superior over HTB-wondershaper?

2003-06-16 Thread Thilo Schulz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 16 June 2003 17:18, Griem, Hans T wrote: > Hello Thilo, > > What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We > have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far > seem to show that htb is much

RE: [LARTC] CBQ-wondershaper superior over HTB-wondershaper?

2003-06-16 Thread Griem, Hans T
Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -Original Me