RE: [LARTC] CONNMARK problem

2005-01-09 Thread Vincent
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leandro Travaglia > Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 9:03 PM > To: LARTC > Subject: [LARTC] CONNMARK problem > > > Hi all, > > I have IPTABLES 1.2.10 and i h

Re: [LARTC] CONNMARK problem

2005-01-09 Thread Leandro Travaglia
I see... I'll do this. But. Is CONNMARK supported in newer versions of the Kernel? Wich one? Regards, LEANDRO TRAVAGLIA Nguyen Dinh Nam wrote: it's because your kernel doesn't support CONNMARK, apply patch-o-matic then recompile your kernel, then it'll work. Leandro Travagli

[LARTC] CONNMARK problem

2005-01-08 Thread Leandro Travaglia
Hi all, I have IPTABLES 1.2.10 and i have a weird problem with CONNMARK When i run: # iptables -v -t mangle -F # iptables -v -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -j CONNMARK --restore-mark CONNMARK tcp opt -- in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 CONNMARK restore iptables: No chain/target/match by that n

Re: [LARTC] CONNMARK problem

2004-09-24 Thread zytek
Dnia piątek 24 wrzesień 2004 19:28, Tomasz Chilinski napisał: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:21:22 +0200, cvok wrote > > > Hello everybody. > > Hello. > > > i think when packet is passing trough my POSTROUTING in mangle table > > it can't match rule 2 or 3, but in the real life it is a little bit > > dif

Re: [LARTC] CONNMARK problem

2004-09-24 Thread Tomasz Chilinski
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:21:22 +0200, cvok wrote > Hello everybody. Hello. > i think when packet is passing trough my POSTROUTING in mangle table > it can't match rule 2 or 3, but in the real life it is a little bit different > > iptables -t mangle -L PREROUTING -v > shows following: > Chain PRERO

[LARTC] CONNMARK problem

2004-09-24 Thread cvok
Hello everybody. i have the folowing problem: i have this in the top of PREROUTING chain in mangle table iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0# rule 1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 5# rule 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmar