Re: [LARTC] Complicated Route Statement

2003-02-06 Thread Matthew S. Crocker
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Mike Nielsen wrote: On Lan A type route add -net 198.185.204.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.24.1 On Lan B type route add -net 198.185.204.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.24.2 On the Cisco type ip route 192.168.24.128 255.255.255.192 192.168.24.1 > > > Hi there. >

[LARTC] Complicated Route Statement

2003-02-05 Thread Mike Nielsen
Hi there. I am having trouble coming up with a routing statement for the following Lan A is connected to LAn B via a Freeswan site to site VPN On lab B there is a cisco router which is handles traffic for an IP address. I need to find a way to have traffic to this Other machine routed th