gypsy wrote:
Could you please post the output of 'route -n', 'ip route' and 'ip neigh
show' as well as any 'ip route [add|del|*]' commands you run?
I guess not. Martin, is there some reason you do not wish to post these
things?
Hello,
sorry for the delay. I have used something like this:
router:
i
gypsy wrote:
>
> Martin Volf wrote:
> > I think you can't use x.x.x.96 here, because it is the address of your network
> > x.x.x.96/28. Useable ip addresses are .97 - .110. And you can't have the same
> > ip address and netmask on two interfaces. Use maybe 'netmask 255.255.255.255'
> > on one of t
Martin Volf wrote:
>
> gypsy wrote:
> ...
> > gypsy> ifconfig eth0 x.x.x.96 broadcast x.x.x.111 netmask
> > 255.255.255.240
> > gypsy> ifconfig eth1 x.x.x.96 broadcast x.x.x.111 netmask
> > 255.255.255.240
>
> I think you can't use x.x.x.96 here, because it is the address of your network
> x.x.x.
gypsy wrote:
...
gypsy> ifconfig eth0 x.x.x.96 broadcast x.x.x.111 netmask
255.255.255.240
gypsy> ifconfig eth1 x.x.x.96 broadcast x.x.x.111 netmask
255.255.255.240
...
I think you can't use x.x.x.96 here, because it is the address of your network
x.x.x.96/28. Useable ip addresses are .97 - .110.
If you have a working proxyARP setup, will you please post it?
I've tried to insert a Linux box between the DSL connection and the
switch, but I'm getting nowhere. Everything works correctly when all
the servers in this network use the switch to get to the DSL. Any box
directly connected to the
