Re: [LARTC] Ethloop

2003-09-08 Thread Stef Coene
On Sunday 07 September 2003 05:25, Yves Bergeron wrote: Hi, This is my scenario I have a 100mbit for 400 routes and the rest of Internet is at 2mbit # #1:1 # / \ #1:2 1:12 # / \ # 1:10 1:11 tc qdisc del

[LARTC] Ethloop

2003-09-06 Thread Yves Bergeron
Hi, This is my scenario I have a 100mbit for 400 routes and the rest of Internet is at 2mbit # #1:1 # / \ #1:2 1:12 # / \ # 1:10 1:11 tc qdisc del dev lo root handle 1: htb default 10 tc qdisc add dev lo

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop again and 4 level tree ???

2002-06-10 Thread King Yung Tong
Thank you for your attention, my web page is on www.cs.dal.ca/~tong 3 experiments were attached. Best Regards, Patrick Tong On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Dear Martin, Hello again, Thank you for you help last time. I think I understand the solution form you and Stef, but when

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop again and 4 level tree ???

2002-06-10 Thread King Yung Tong
Hello Martin, Any comment for the graph in my web site? Pat On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Thank you for your attention, my web page is on www.cs.dal.ca/~tong 3 experiments were attached. Best Regards, Patrick Tong On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Dear

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop again and 4 level tree ???

2002-06-09 Thread King Yung Tong
Dear Martin, Hello again, Thank you for you help last time. I think I understand the solution form you and Stef, but when come to ethloop, the result is not like this. I repost the question, I am pleased if you can give me a quick fix of the problem? Sorry to bother you. I try to create final

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop again and 4 level tree ???

2002-06-08 Thread King Yung Tong
Hello again, Thank you for you help last time. I try to create final check for htb, and found some problem. Can you give a quick fix for the problem? 1:1 (ceil 1500kbps) / \ (ceil 800kbps)1:2 1:8 (ceil 700kbps) /\

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop again and 4 level tree ???

2002-06-08 Thread Stef Coene
On Saturday 08 June 2002 20:10, King Yung Tong wrote: Hello again, Thank you for you help last time. I try to create final check for htb, and found some problem. Can you give a quick fix for the problem? 1:1 (ceil 1500kbps) / \ (ceil 800kbps)

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?

2002-06-07 Thread Martin Devera
What is the problem ? use cat ethloop_script|./ethloop for example .. devik On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Dear all, I copy a Ethloop script for tc script, but no response??? Does anyone know how to use ethloop? Ethloop; #1st parameter -- time in milliseconds from program

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?

2002-06-07 Thread King Yung Tong
Thank you for you answer, 1:10 is incresed but 1:20 is also increased and increase to the specific rate if I add 100kbps to every line. In my case, I would like to put all the extra to 1:10 only, is that means I have to give 1:11 ceil to 10kbps. If it is, is that means I don't need prio

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?

2002-06-07 Thread King Yung Tong
Thank you for you help. Here is the HTB echo Clean all the tc setup ./tc qdisc del dev lo root ./tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 12 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps ceil 100kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 40kbps ceil 100kbps

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?

2002-06-07 Thread King Yung Tong
Thank you, I put 100kbps to both 1:11 and 1:10. 1:10 (prio 0) get almost 50kbps form 60kbps excess and 1:20 (prio 1) get 10kbps form excess. Is it the expected result? I gussess the all 60kbps (excess) should go to prio 0 or by proportional to rate in each class. Pat On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?

2002-06-07 Thread Martin Devera
ethloop output (as text) On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Thank you, I put 100kbps to both 1:11 and 1:10. 1:10 (prio 0) get almost 50kbps form 60kbps excess and 1:20 (prio 1) get 10kbps form excess. Is it the expected result? I gussess the all 60kbps (excess) should go to prio 0 or

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?

2002-06-07 Thread King Yung Tong
Thank you, I put 100kbps to both 1:11 and 1:10. 1:10 (prio 0) get almost 50kbps form 60kbps excess and 1:20 (prio 1) get 10kbps form excess. Is it the expected result? I gussess the all 60kbps (excess) should go to prio 0 or by proportional to rate in each class. The rate on the original class is

Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?

2002-06-07 Thread Martin Devera
6.0 101170 92980 20 0 101108 9802 570 0 186 186 0 0 6.5 98639 89751 38 0 98624 13015 577 0 44 44 0 0 7.0 99815 93172 20 0 99812 9755 578 0 10 10 0 0 here it is exacly what you want 7.5 63232 65056 0 0 39204 23397 41 0 3 3 0 0 8.0 54142 54575 0 0 22722 18971 3 0 1 1 0 0 8.5 51258 51361 0 0