On Thursday 26 April 2007 19:34, terraja-based wrote:
Hi folks,
Hi!
Hola!
I`ve a problem to use HTB and SFQ.
The first script, below, to show a simple configuration, does work
fine...!!!
But, in the second example, does not work, becouse i put more code to
clasify the traffic by protocol,
Hi folks,
I`ve a problem to use HTB and SFQ.
The first script, below, to show a simple configuration, does work
fine...!!!
But, in the second example, does not work, becouse i put more code to
clasify the traffic by protocol, http and ftp in this case.
Somebody can tell me the errors?
Thx, in
I got this reply from don would rather answer on list so more people
have a chance to correct any of my misconceptions :-)
[this message off list - feel free to forward it, but leave out my address]
I wanted to see where from a slot the packets got dropped when the queue
was full. (e)sfq
I set up a little test to see what the behaviour of (e)sfq was - because
I couldn't work it out from the source :-) .
I wanted to see where from a slot the packets got dropped when the queue
was full. (e)sfq drops from the longest slot to make space for an
incoming packet, so it's not tail
Hello.
I have small question: there is one leaf class(htb), with qdisc attached
to it with 'sfq'. I mark packets(using iptables) with different source
ips with mark 1 to send them in above class. Can you tell me: will they
fairly divide that class's rate?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
