Did someone solve this problem?I receive this error (on dmesg) when I
launch my script for eth1:
KERNEL: assertion (cl cl-un.leaf.q-q.qlen) failed at
sch_htb.c(959)
Why ?
you should provide more info, version, script ..
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did someone solve this problem?
I receive this error (on dmesg) when I launch my script for eth1:
KERNEL: assertion (cl cl-un.leaf.q-q.qlen) failed at sch_htb.c(959)
Why ?
] HTB Kernel log (cl cl-un.leaf.q-q.qlen)
you should provide more info, version, script ..
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did someone solve this problem?
I receive this error (on dmesg) when I launch my script for eth1:
KERNEL: assertion (cl cl-un.leaf.q-q.qlen) failed
Ok, try please 2.4.21. Also can you trigger the bug
often or only sometimes ? Does it depend on traffic ?
I'm looking how to reproduce it here ..
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK No problem!
I'm useing Slack 9.0/2.4.20( AMD K6 2-333Mhz with RAM 128MB) with HTB from
kernel...and
yes I think it depends on traffic...
but why this?
PS
1) http://qos.dyndns.org:3389/cgi-bin/fom?file=40 what should I use on my K6
??? default it's PSCHED_JIFFIES, i think!!
2) http://qos.dyndns.org:3389/cgi-bin/fom?file=56 those filter destroy
patches are applyed in 2.4.21 ??
3)
On Thursday 03 July 2003 13:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes I think it depends on traffic...
but why this?
PS
1) http://qos.dyndns.org:3389/cgi-bin/fom?file=40 what should I use on my
K6 ??? default it's PSCHED_JIFFIES, i think!!
I'm not sure but if you do cat /proc/cpuinfo, do you seetsc in
On kernel 2.4.18 through 20 I could reproduce this by deleting my root
qdiscs and re-creating them every minute. I have since moved over to a
different way of counting the packets so I no longer do this and the
messages stopped.
At 13:02 03/07/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Ok, try please 2.4.21. Also
Message -
From: David Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July, 2003 15:48 PM
Subject: Re: RE:RE:[LARTC] HTB Kernel log (cl cl-un.leaf.q-q.qlen)
On kernel 2.4.18 through 20 I could reproduce this by deleting my root
qdiscs and re-creating them every minute. I have
I was recreating the qdiscs so that changes would be picked up
automatically and not disturb the rrdtool generation, I've switched to a
counter and cut out the resets.
I did do a lot of ping tests and cannot replicate losing packets
however.
Thanks
At 21:55 18/06/2003 +0200,
David Watson wrote:
I did do a lot of ping tests and cannot replicate losing packets
however.
Hmmm, let me get back to you on this. I will test it again on Monday...
- Giannis
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I delete and recreate my root HTB qdiscs every minute as part of my rdd
logging.
From archive this seems to have come up a couple of times before although
I dont see a resolution on the list, any advice on how I can find out what
the problem is?
Thanks
I get the following errors
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 13:29, David Watson wrote:
Hello,
I delete and recreate my root HTB qdiscs every minute as part of my rdd
logging.
Why? That's not needed.
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using Linux as bandwidth manager
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @
Stef Coene wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 13:29, David Watson wrote:
ello,
I delete and recreate my root HTB qdiscs every minute as part of my rdd
logging.
Why? That's not needed.
Never mind that. The most important issue here is that when you delete
your queues, any packet that happens to
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 20:53, Giannis Stoilis wrote:
Stef Coene wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 13:29, David Watson wrote:
ello,
I delete and recreate my root HTB qdiscs every minute as part of my rdd
logging.
Why? That's not needed.
Never mind that. The most important issue
Stef Coene wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 20:53, Giannis Stoilis wrote:
Never mind that. The most important issue here is that when you delete
your queues, any packet that happens to pass through them at that time,
are LOST!
Are you sure? I never tested it.
This is how I know it:
I constantly
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 21:17, Giannis Stoilis wrote:
Stef Coene wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 20:53, Giannis Stoilis wrote:
Never mind that. The most important issue here is that when you delete
your queues, any packet that happens to pass through them at that time,
are LOST!
Are
16 matches
Mail list logo