Re: [LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-16 Thread Stef Coene
On Sunday 15 June 2003 22:47, Trevor Warren wrote: > Stef, > > Can cbq/htb support classes for 1000> clients concurrently??. That will be tricky. I think it can, but it will depends a lot on the used hardware. Also, what's the speed of the link you are going to shape? Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-16 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 16 June 2003 15:02, Joachim Wickman wrote: > > > But your idea of one class / ip is something I'm thinking of to make > > now. > > > > So I don't need to fill in the MAC or IP when a new client comes to > > town. > > > So not all classes will be actvive? For performance considerations, o

Re: [LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-16 Thread Joachim Wickman
> > But your idea of one class / ip is something I'm thinking of to make now. > > So I don't need to fill in the MAC or IP when a new client comes to town. > So not all classes will be actvive? For performance considerations, only the > active classes are important. Right now there are about 20-30

Re: [LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-16 Thread Trevor Warren
Stef, Can cbq/htb support classes for 1000> clients concurrently??. Trevor On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 13:20, Stef Coene wrote: > On Monday 16 June 2003 09:29, Joachim Wickman wrote: > > Thanks for the answer. > > > > How many classes can HTB take? > > I use 4-6 interfaces / computer and 2 pools / i

Re: [LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-16 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 16 June 2003 09:29, Joachim Wickman wrote: > Thanks for the answer. > > How many classes can HTB take? > I use 4-6 interfaces / computer and 2 pools / interface which is has 62 > addresses each. > So there would be about 512 classes if I make one for each address. No problem for htb. But

Re: [LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-16 Thread Joachim Wickman
Thanks for the answer. How many classes can HTB take? I use 4-6 interfaces / computer and 2 pools / interface which is has 62 addresses each. So there would be about 512 classes if I make one for each address. > I think this came from some mails of about 6 or 8 months ago on the LARTC > list, no

[LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-13 Thread Burnside, Andrew
their IP changes. Andrew :From: "Joachim Wickman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 21:03:43 +0300 :Subject: [LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses :This is a multi-part message in MIME format. :--=_NextPart_000_0048_01C33126.1B78DD90 :I

Re: [LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-12 Thread Martin A. Brown
Joachim, (Beautiful name, by the way) : I've searched the archive for a solution where I want to limit/shape : WLAN users. I only know's their MAC, because they get their IP from : dhcp. : : > Why not, just use negative offsets with U32 to access : >the 14-byte eth frame header before t

Re: [LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-12 Thread David Boreham
>I've searched the archive for a solution where I want to limit/shape >WLAN users. I only know's their MAC, because they get their IP from dhcp. Get their IP addresses from arp. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman

[LARTC] HTB and TC on MAC addresses

2003-06-12 Thread Joachim Wickman
Hi   I've searched the archive for a solution where I want to limit/shape WLAN users. I only know's their MAC, because they get their IP from dhcp.   > Why not, just use negative offsets with U32 to access>the 14-byte eth frame header before the IP header:>>Decimal Ofs Description>-