Stefano Mainardi wrote:
tc class add dev eth1 parent 11:1 classid 11:2 htb rate 70Mbit ceil 70Mbit
burst 6k cburst 64k quantum 1600
I am not sure if it matters in this case with the big cburst - but
remember burst * 8 * HZ will be the bit rate a class can reach.
Andy.
Hi Andy,how i must setup the value for CBURST for my situation? Have you read?Ste2006/6/1, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:Stefano Mainardi wrote: tc class add dev eth1 parent 11:1 classid 11:2 htb rate 70Mbit ceil 70Mbit
burst 6k cburst 64k quantum 1600I am not sure if it matters in this case
Stefano Mainardi wrote:
Hi Andy,
how i must setup the value for CBURST for my situation? Have you read?
I think the burst is too small - In your case I would just not specify
either burst and let htb choose them.
Andy.
Ste
2006/6/1, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stefano Mainardi
Ok, i try without CBURST value.Thanks ;)2006/6/1, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stefano Mainardi wrote: Hi Andy, how i must setup the value for CBURST for my situation? Have you read?I think the burst is too small - In your case I would just not specifyeither burst and let htb choose them.
Andy.
Stefano Mainardi wrote:
Ok, i try without CBURST value.
Without burst aswell ...
Andy.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Ops BURST...sorry!And CBURST value you think that is correct?2006/6/1, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stefano Mainardi wrote: Ok, i try without CBURST value.Without burst aswell ...
Andy.-- Stefano MainardiPresidente Associazione ILDN - Italian Linux Distro NetworkMobile: 349/3917212Skype:
Stefano Mainardi wrote:
Ops BURST...sorry!
And CBURST value you think that is correct?
I would leave that out aswell and let htb choose it from the rate of the
class.
Andy.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
Andreas,if I want that A,B,C can borrow bandwidth from each other? How i can the structure of HTB tree?Stefano2006/5/28, Andreas Klauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:04:57AM +0200, Stefano Mainardi wrote:
Like I said above, in the case that B is not producing traffic, 7/8 of the
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:28:12PM +0200, Stefano Mainardi wrote:
The goal is to divide the traffic for classes of workstations, at example in
three classes, let say A, B and C.
Sounds simple enough...
If B don't make traffic, 7/8 of 20Mb/s must be assigned to A and all the
rest at B
Why
2006/5/27, Andreas Klauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If B don't make traffic, 7/8 of 20Mb/s must be assigned to A and all the rest at BWhy would you assign traffic at B if it doesn't make traffic?Sorry, all the rest at A :)
Post your HTB script and I (and probably others) will have a look at it.
This
2006/5/28, Andreas Klauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So, in other words, A is allowed to take bandwidth from B.B and C stick to their bandwidth limits.There is a misunderstanding, sorry.I need to know if it is possible to manage in a dynamic way the assignment of traffic to workstations and of the traffic
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:04:57AM +0200, Stefano Mainardi wrote:
Like I said above, in the case that B is not producing traffic, 7/8 of the
20 MB/s need to be assigned to A and the remaining 1/8 will remain to B.
Well, reducing the ceil of A by 1/8 of B's bandwidth in the tree I
posted
12 matches
Mail list logo
