Re: [LARTC] HTB_debug_dump: is annoying :) [Pach included]

2003-07-05 Thread devik
And what about attached one ? It seems to do the same but is less intrusive. htb_debug_dump is meant to do its output in all cases because it is called from bug-reporting places too. But yes the call in htb_dump is superfluous so I used your idea but changed it a bit. I'll submit it for inclusion l

Re: [LARTC] HTB_debug_dump: is annoying :) [Pach included]

2003-07-05 Thread Mike Mestnik
No, the patch dose not affect tc only dmesg/klogd ect. It changes printk's into HTB_DBG macros, these macros don't print unless you set HTB into debug mode :) The default kernel workes ?great? with my script 2.4.x and 2.5.x. Here is an example... The script workes like so... (10: is the qdisc-i

Re: [LARTC] HTB_debug_dump: is annoying :) [Pach included]

2003-07-04 Thread Trevor Warren
Sorry Mike, This isn't an answer to your queries but instead a question. I would like to know if there are any added fields to the tc -s -d output post application of the 2.5 kernel patch you have applied below. Cause i am using htb with 2.4.21 and there isn't much of graphing i can do with the

[LARTC] HTB_debug_dump: is annoying :) [Pach included]

2003-07-04 Thread Mike Mestnik
I use MRTG to graph tc -d output, so the debug_dump fills up my dmesg logs ect. It's just annoying. Attached is a patch vs 2.5.74 and my MRTG script. __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com linux-2.5.74.htbdebug.patch D