Re: [LARTC] Inaccurate results without natting the traffic.

2005-10-19 Thread Alvaro Motta
Hi Corey, First, let me thank you for your message. Sorry for not responding before. As per your request, here is a sketch of my test bed environment. | | | | | | | A|--| B

Re: [LARTC] Inaccurate results without natting the traffic.

2005-10-19 Thread Corey Hickey
Alvaro Motta wrote: I hope this is enough information for you to try to help me. Thanks for your time and consideration. Well, it looks like you've posted enough information now. Unfortunately, I'm not having any bright ideas. You have me stumped. Hopefully someone else on this list will

[LARTC] Inaccurate results without natting the traffic.

2005-10-11 Thread Alvaro Motta
Hi folks. For quite a while, I tried to use linux (cbq and htb) to control bandwidth in order to replace a cisco equipment used to play this role on our network. After trying here and there, with a bunch of different distros, different versions, different compilations, ... the closest I could

Re: [LARTC] Inaccurate results without natting the traffic.

2005-10-11 Thread Corey Hickey
Alvaro Motta wrote: Now I come to you guys again, with the question: How to make cbq or htb work without masquerading the traffic? That really isn't supposed to have anything to do with it Can you post your configuration files/scripts and a quick ASCII map showing where your Linux machine