Re: [LARTC] Internal Qdisc

2005-04-27 Thread Patrick McHardy
R Harper wrote: TBF provides traffic shaping by the Token Bucket theory, while SFQ makes sure(actually just hints) swap packets in different sessions so that no particular session will hang around for a long time. Yes I know the difference between TBF and SFQ. I was trying to ask about the program

Re: [LARTC] Internal Qdisc

2005-04-27 Thread R Harper
TBF provides traffic shaping by the Token Bucket theory, while SFQ makes sure(actually just hints) swap packets in different sessions so that no particular session will hang around for a long time. Yes I know the difference between TBF and SFQ. I was trying to ask about the programming/architectura

Re: [LARTC] Internal Qdisc

2005-04-27 Thread Leo
Hi TBF provides traffic shaping by the Token Bucket theory, while SFQ makes sure(actually just hints) swap packets in different sessions so that no particular session will hang around for a long time. Leo R Harper wrote: > Hell > I'm new to Qdisc programming and I was wondering, what is the diff

[LARTC] Internal Qdisc

2005-04-27 Thread R Harper
Hell I'm new to Qdisc programming and I was wondering, what is the difference between using an internal Qdisc (like e.g. TBF does) vs. not using internal Qdisc (like e.g. SFQ does)? Can someone give me a quick rundown of pro and cons? with regards R.harper ___