Re: [LARTC] Is this actually possible?

2004-10-14 Thread Zviad O. Giorgadze
Hello gypsy, Thank you for information. This patch solves all my problems. FOR EVERYONE = HTB borrowing has problems in kernels up to 2.4.27 (not sure about 2.6 series). Apply patch 21.6.2004. http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ Best regards, Zviad === At 2004-10-14,

Re: [LARTC] Is this actually possible?

2004-10-14 Thread Jason Boxman
On Thursday 14 October 2004 06:37, Zviad O. Giorgadze wrote: Hello gypsy, Thank you for information. This patch solves all my problems. FOR EVERYONE = HTB borrowing has problems in kernels up to 2.4.27 (not sure about 2.6 series). Apply patch 21.6.2004. It's in 2.6.8.1 and

Re: [LARTC] Is this actually possible?

2004-10-14 Thread Stef Coene
On Thursday 14 October 2004 05:46, Ow Mun Heng wrote: I have TSL 2.1, kernel 2.4.27-3tr. I changed the PSCHED_CPU and disabled the HTB hysteresis, set SFQ queue length to 16 I'm not sure what are those. If anyone can explain that,it wold be nice - HTB hysteries is an undocumented option and

[LARTC] Is this actually possible?

2004-10-13 Thread Peter Huetmannsberger
Hi everyone, and thanks for your help so far. I have been playing around with tc and htb for a couple of weeks now, and while I am nowhere near understanding everything here, I am beginning to know more about packets than I ever wanted to know. I have two university buildings with a 1mb

Re: [LARTC] Is this actually possible?

2004-10-13 Thread Zviad O. Giorgadze
Hi everyone, and thanks for your help so far. I have been playing around with tc and htb for a couple of weeks now, and while I am nowhere near understanding everything here, I am beginning to know more about packets than I ever wanted to know. I have two university buildings with a 1mb

Re: [LARTC] Is this actually possible?

2004-10-13 Thread Ow Mun Heng
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 02:10, Zviad O. Giorgadze wrote: According to tc-htb man page, if we set PRIO parameter, then after supplying the packets to satisfy the RATE of all classes, the HTB first sends the available packets to LOWEST PRIO class and so on. I think that's correct In this case if

Re: [LARTC] Is this actually possible?

2004-10-13 Thread gypsy
Zviad O. Giorgadze wrote: Only if I lower the ceiling on leaf 1:30 does it show any results. If I have the ceiling the same on both, there is no measureable result in speed. The both seem to share the connection equally. Am I missing the point, is it possible at all, or am I just too dum