Great Tobias,
sounds good for limiting per session tcp ..
Thanks, i also want to have it test.
Will post to list if i succeed..
Regards,
Rio Martin.
On 11 September 2004 am 10:14, Tobias Geiger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't imagine a "clean" tc-only solution,
> but look at the extra-patch-o-matic ma
Hi,
I can't imagine a "clean" tc-only solution,
but look at the extra-patch-o-matic matches in iptables:
from http://www.netfilter.org/patch-o-matic/pom-extra.html#pom-extra-connrate
-
Author: Nuutti Kotivuori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: Working, but received only minimal testing
Dnia piątek 10 wrzesień 2004 01:57, Simon Byrnand napisał:
> Hi All,
>
> Does anyone know of a way to limit the speed of *individual* TCP sessions,
> but without placing any overall bandwidth limits, and without requiring an
> explicit QoS entry for every ip address the machine is communicating wit
but it would be great! Isn't it?
Thanks & Regards
Krishna Guda
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:57:41 +1200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [LARTC] Limiting speed of individual TCP sessions ?
Hi All,
Does anyone know of a way to lim
On Friday 10 September 2004 01:57, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> The scenario is a mailserver - say you want to limit individual TCP
> sessions (pop3, smtp etc) to no more than 512Kbit so that an individual
> session can't hog your bandwidth, but you don't want to place a maximum
> limit on the TOTAL traf
Hi All,
Does anyone know of a way to limit the speed of *individual* TCP sessions,
but without placing any overall bandwidth limits, and without requiring an
explicit QoS entry for every ip address the machine is communicating with ?
The scenario is a mailserver - say you want to limit individua
