[LARTC] Multiple links and nat

2006-01-20 Thread Mikael Svenson
I read the previous thread about this but I seem to have a small problem. I'm running gentoo with 2.6.14 kernel and have applied the patch from http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes. If I try to lynx to two different pages from the box itself it switches the interfaces every other time which is how i

Re: [LARTC] multiple links and nat

2006-01-06 Thread gypsy
seph wrote: > > I was hoping to avoid having to patch things. I'll take a look at > mpath and see what I want to do. > > If it really does need patching than I think the howto should be > updated to reflect that. > > seph Seph, The HOWTO has not been updated in years. Who knows when, if ever,

Re: [LARTC] multiple links and nat

2006-01-06 Thread seph
I was hoping to avoid having to patch things. I'll take a look at mpath and see what I want to do. If it really does need patching than I think the howto should be updated to reflect that. seph Robert Kurjata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Witaj Edmundo, > > W Twoim li�cie datowanym 5 stycznia

Re[2]: [LARTC] multiple links and nat

2006-01-05 Thread Robert Kurjata
Witaj Edmundo, W Twoim liœcie datowanym 5 stycznia 2006 (17:21:52) mo¿na przeczytaæ: Please consult: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes and my example scpript mpath2.sh published there. Without those patches - it just doesn't work :) > The problem (as usual) is the change of route the routing box i

Re: [LARTC] multiple links and nat

2006-01-05 Thread Edmundo Carmona
The problem (as usual) is the change of route the routing box is doing for connections already stablished. Maybe you can try using separate routing tablewith a single internet link for ssh (policy routing). On 1/5/06, seph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, this might be a dumb question, but I'm n

[LARTC] multiple links and nat

2006-01-05 Thread seph
Hi, this might be a dumb question, but I'm not finding much information online. I'm trying to setup a 2.6 linux box to run nat across multiple upstream links as a simple way to aggregate bandwidth. I found the instructions in lartc section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html

Re: [LARTC] Multiple Links

2005-04-14 Thread Nguyen Dinh Nam
You may want to read my tutorial http://routeskeeper.sourceforge.net/Routeskeeper/MultihomingWithLinux.html And feel free to ask your questions On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 15:58 +0200, Paulo Andre wrote: > I have two ISP links that I am trying to firewall through a Linux > Server, I have been followin

[LARTC] Multiple Links

2005-04-14 Thread Paulo Andre
I have two ISP links that I am trying to firewall through a Linux Server, I have been following http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html and I can not seem to get it working. Do you have to NAT the incoming packets for this to work correctly?

RE: [LARTC] Multiple Links

2003-09-22 Thread Matthieu Turpault
art de hare ram > Envoyé : jeudi 18 septembre 2003 09:37 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : [LARTC] Multiple Links > > > Hi all > > > Iam planning to deploy Multiple Links > using RH 9.0/ PIII 500Mhz/512MB RAM > With all Patches related to Route and rest Mentioned in

[LARTC] Multiple Links

2003-09-18 Thread hare ram
Hi all Iam planning to deploy Multiple Links using RH 9.0/ PIII 500Mhz/512MB RAM With all Patches related to Route and rest Mentioned in nano.txt Iam Running BGP 4 with all the ISP, but iam not doing Load balancing the Links Each Link have specific application and specific users. Eth0 is conne