On Friday 01 August 2003 17:56, Raj Mathur wrote:
> Hi Stef,
>
> > "Stef" == Stef Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Stef> [snip]
>
> Stef> Better, remove burst, cburst and quantum. And remove the
> Stef> sfq qdiscs and add 3 fifo qdiscs.
>
> Can do that, but will it permit the
Hi Stef,
> "Stef" == Stef Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stef> [snip]
Stef> Better, remove burst, cburst and quantum. And remove the
Stef> sfq qdiscs and add 3 fifo qdiscs.
Can do that, but will it permit the PCs in each pool to share the
bandwidth available to that pool equ
On Friday 01 August 2003 17:13, Martin A. Brown wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> : I tried the recommendations of people on this list and tried tweaking
> : the QUANTUM values in my HTB configuration, but still have the problem
> : of the excess bandwidth not being shared proportionately between
> : differ
Hi Martin,
> "Martin" == Martin A Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raj> : I tried the recommendations of people on this list
Raj> and tried tweaking : the QUANTUM values in my HTB
Raj> configuration, but still have the problem : of the excess
Raj> bandwidth not being shared p
Hi Raj,
: I tried the recommendations of people on this list and tried tweaking
: the QUANTUM values in my HTB configuration, but still have the problem
: of the excess bandwidth not being shared proportionately between
: different pools.
Could you tell us which interface is your "transmit to
Hi,
I tried the recommendations of people on this list and tried tweaking
the QUANTUM values in my HTB configuration, but still have the problem
of the excess bandwidth not being shared proportionately between
different pools.
Am enclosing the set of tc commands I'm using to generate the pools.
T
