Re: [LARTC] Question on hashkey

On Tuesday 13 August 2002 04:27, Cheng Kwok Wing, William wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your reply. > > Does it mean that "fw" has implemented hashing > implicitly?? > > Suppose I've the following fitler rules: > tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 3 > handle 1 fw > tc filter add dev e

Re: [LARTC] Question on hashkey

Hi, Thanks for your reply. Does it mean that "fw" has implemented hashing implicitly?? Suppose I've the following fitler rules: tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 3 handle 1 fw tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 3 handle 2 fw tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protoc

Re: [LARTC] Question on hashkey

> 1. > tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip perent 1:0 \ > prio 5 u32 ht 800:: \ > match ip src 1.2.0.0/16 \ > hashkey mask 0x00ff at 12 \ > link 2: > > It seems that the hashkey make can only applied to ip > header. How can I use the marked number in a packet > (using iptables) as the hashkey??

[LARTC] Question on hashkey

Hi, I've been working on hashing in tc for a month. Since there are only a limited number of avaialbe example on hashing, I'll be appreciate if someone can my questions as follows: 1. tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip perent 1:0 \ prio 5 u32 ht 800:: \ match ip src 1.2.0.0/16 \ hashkey mask 0x0