Is added table 10 to the rt_tables file? :
echo 201 10 /etc/iproute2/rt_tables
if no, do it first, one time. Then run the ip route command.
Bye.
Marcos.
Robert Kurjata escribi:
Cytowanie Marc-Christian Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 17:32, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
Can you post your Full config? Might be able to help you out. I had the
same problem until I removed one of my config lines which fixed the
issue (Look at old Posts).
- Cheers
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 05:25, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 17:32, Marc-Christian Petersen
On Thursday 26 August 2004 15:06, Marcos Schonfeld wrote:
Hi Marcos,
ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1 table 10
ip route add default via $P1 table 10
ip route add $P2_NET dev $IF2 src $IP2 table 20
ip route add default via $P2 table 20
ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1 # This
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 17:02, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
ip route add 212.71.142.210/29 dev eth1 src 212.71.142.210 table 10
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
blubber bleh silly me. I implemented ipcalc.pl in my brain now ;)
--
ciao, Marc
Hello,
From the looks of it you have the IP Network incorrect, You need to set
this to your Network... for example ..
ip route add 23.215.4.0/26 dev eth2 src 23.215.4.61 table T2
23.215.4.0 is the network address, because 23.215.4.1 is my gateway for
this interface (Router). If you still have
Hello,
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean that using NAT its impossible to do load balance or
this is the worng command? If its the wrong command, what´s
the right one?
Don't disappoint, you can check the following patches
and howtos:
Cytowanie Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean that using NAT its impossible to do load balance or
this is the worng command? If its the wrong command, whats
the right one?
Don't disappoint, you can check
Hi, I don't share your opinion. In fact, I worked hard to get all this
things working and finally it DOES work. I followed the explanation in
the LARTC-HOWTO in section 4.2:
ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1 table 10
ip route add default via $P1 table 10
ip route add $P2_NET dev $IF2 src
ip route add default scope global nexthop via $P1 dev $IF1 weight 1 \
nexthop via $P2 dev $IF2 weight 1
This multipath routing command keep coming up as classic
way to perform multipath routing for NAT access, which I
considered it as VERY misleading.
It should only be used if you
ip route add default scope global nexthop via $P1 dev
$IF1 weight 1 \
nexthop via $P2 dev $IF2 weight 1
This multipath routing command keep coming up as classic
way to perform multipath routing for NAT access, which I
considered it as VERY misleading.
It should only be
ip route add default scope global nexthop via $P1 dev
$IF1 weight 1 \
nexthop via $P2 dev $IF2 weight 1
This multipath routing command keep coming up as classic
way to perform multipath routing for NAT access, which I
considered it as VERY misleading.
It should only
11 matches
Mail list logo
