On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 06:14:13PM +0100, Simon Lodal wrote:
...
> Regards
...
It seems decisions makers need more time, so I'd add
2 cents more:
1c: an indentation could be improved (spaces around
operators), like in these places:
>+#define HTB_MAX_CLS (TC_H_MIN(-1)+1)
...
>+ ht
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 06:14:13PM +0100, Simon Lodal wrote:
> On Monday 05 February 2007 11:16, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On 01-02-2007 12:30, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Simon Lodal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> Memory is generally not an issue, but CPU is, and you can not beat the
> > >> CPU e
On Thursday 01 February 2007 12:30, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Simon Lodal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Memory is generally not an issue, but CPU is, and you can not beat the
> > CPU efficiency of plain array lookup (always faster, and constant time).
>
> Actually that's not true when the array doesn't
On Monday 05 February 2007 11:16, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On 01-02-2007 12:30, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Simon Lodal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Memory is generally not an issue, but CPU is, and you can not beat the
> >> CPU efficiency of plain array lookup (always faster, and constant time).
>
>
On 01-02-2007 12:30, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Simon Lodal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Memory is generally not an issue, but CPU is, and you can not beat the CPU
>> efficiency of plain array lookup (always faster, and constant time).
Probably for some old (or embedded) lean boxes used for
small netw
On Thursday 01 February 2007 07:08, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Simon Lodal wrote:
> > This patch changes HTB's class storage from hash+lists to a two-level
> > linear array, so it can do constant time (O(1)) class lookup by classid.
> > It improves scalability for large number of classes.
> >
> > Wit
Simon Lodal wrote:
> This patch changes HTB's class storage from hash+lists to a two-level linear
> array, so it can do constant time (O(1)) class lookup by classid. It improves
> scalability for large number of classes.
>
> Without the patch, ~14k htb classes can starve a Xeon-3.2 at only 15kpp
