--- Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Andy Furniss wrote:
So, my question would be, how to 'divide' or
'recognize' incoming and outgoing traffic, and to
treat it as different channels?? I was thinking
about
using a IMQ device for incoming traffic, but this
apperas to be a
Ricardo Soria wrote:
--- Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Andy Furniss wrote:
So, my question would be, how to 'divide' or
'recognize' incoming and outgoing traffic, and to
treat it as different channels?? I was thinking
about
using a IMQ device for incoming traffic, but this
apperas
Ricardo Soria wrote:
There may be traffic for a local (linux box) process,
but the most of the traffic will be redirected or
passed.
Do you want to shape eth0 aswell as the internet
link or is it OK for
spare bandwidth?
I cannot translate/understand perfectly this question,
but I do need to
--- Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Ricardo Soria wrote:
--- Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Andy Furniss wrote:
So, my question would be, how to 'divide' or
'recognize' incoming and outgoing traffic, and
to
treat it as different channels?? I was thinking
--- Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Ricardo Soria wrote:
So, returning to the question that originated this
discussion, how can I diferentiate/separate
incoming
and outgoing traffic for the same interface
(eth0),
without confusing each other, and without using
IMQ
--- Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Ricardo Soria wrote:
Very thanks for your suggestion, but... Consider
that
the traffic that comes from the cisco 1600 is not
originated into itself; this router is just
passing
traffic that comes from Internet (infinite source
MAC
Ricardo Soria wrote:
So, returning to the question that originated this
discussion, how can I diferentiate/separate incoming
and outgoing traffic for the same interface (eth0),
without confusing each other, and without using IMQ
devices if possible ??
My mails don't seem to be getting to/from
Ricardo Soria wrote:
Very thanks for your suggestion, but... Consider that
the traffic that comes from the cisco 1600 is not
originated into itself; this router is just passing
traffic that comes from Internet (infinite source MAC
addresses possible)
I don't think so - ethernet is link layer
,
Ricardo Soria wrote:
Well, as I promised, here I am again :-)
I have not got ESFQ yet, but what I think really
helped was shorting bandwidth capacity to its 88%.
But here I have a new problem again: there are
certain moments when I am really running out of
bandwidth. The scenario now is as
Andy Furniss wrote:
So, my question would be, how to 'divide' or
'recognize' incoming and outgoing traffic, and to
treat it as different channels?? I was thinking about
using a IMQ device for incoming traffic, but this
apperas to be a 'little bit' more complicated that
what I expected. So, may
Well, as I promised, here I am again :-)
I have not got ESFQ yet, but what I think really
helped was shorting bandwidth capacity to its 88%.
But here I have a new problem again: there are
certain moments when I am really running out of
bandwidth. The scenario now is as follows:
I am using my
that.
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo Soria [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] SEPARATING VOIP AND SURFING
Well, as I promised, here I am again :-)
I have not got ESFQ yet
PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] SEPARATING VOIP AND SURFING
Well, as I promised, here I am again :-)
I have not got ESFQ yet, but what I think really
helped was shorting bandwidth capacity to its 88%.
But here I have a new problem
Dear friends:
Very thanks for all your help. I have made many
changes to my scrip this days, fixing up some problems
and mistakes I found. It seems now I have a very
acceptable VoIP quality, and everything is working
notably better. I am actually using 450kbit of the
total 512 available. Next
Jason Boxman wrote:
On Monday 15 November 2004 20:06, Ricardo Soria
wrote:
snip
Dear Andy:
Very thanks for your answer. However, I need a
little
bit more extended explanation.
First, you say that I should back off more from
link
speed - total ceils to about 80% and share that
Ricardo Soria wrote:
1. So, starting at 80% of total 512kbit bandwidth
(410kbit), there would be a waste of 102kbit. Is this
completely necessary?? I think this is to ensure I
have the queue on my side, and the queue is not on the
side of the ISP. But, I fell tempted to think that
102kbit is
Andy Furniss wrote:
Ricardo Soria wrote:
1. So, starting at 80% of total 512kbit bandwidth
(410kbit), there would be a waste of 102kbit. Is this
completely necessary?? I think this is to ensure I
have the queue on my side, and the queue is not on the
side of the ISP. But, I fell tempted to
Jason Boxman wrote:
On Monday 15 November 2004 20:06, Ricardo Soria wrote:
snip
Dear Andy:
Very thanks for your answer. However, I need a little
bit more extended explanation.
First, you say that I should back off more from link
speed - total ceils to about 80% and share that
between interactive
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 09:53, Andy Furniss wrote:
snip
I would do a bit more work to priorotise dns/empty acks/small tcp etc.
as well as VOIP, then give them a class with plenty of rate spare and
make bulk borrow. This would mean that each user would notice a bit less
the fact they have
Jason Boxman wrote:
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 09:53, Andy Furniss wrote:
snip
I would do a bit more work to priorotise dns/empty acks/small tcp etc.
as well as VOIP, then give them a class with plenty of rate spare and
make bulk borrow. This would mean that each user would notice a bit less
the
Ricardo Soria wrote:
Dear list:
I have a problem I cannot handle yet, and need to
solve it as soon as possible. Would be very greatful
with anybody who can help me.
I have a 512/512 link to internet, that I want to
share between several computers. I have eth0, with a
public IP address, conected
Dear list:
I have a problem I cannot handle yet, and need to
solve it as soon as possible. Would be very greatful
with anybody who can help me.
I have a 512/512 link to internet, that I want to
share between several computers. I have eth0, with a
public IP address, conected to Internet, and
22 matches
Mail list logo
