Re: VoIP using just prio qdisc? No. was [ [LARTC] Sanity Check ]

2006-07-10 Thread Martin A. Brown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, : So, instead of trying to use a prio qdisc alone, try using a : single HTB class to limit your traffic to a given rate and then : embed your prio qdisc inside that. There are many other possible : options for nested qdiscs, and

Re: VoIP using just prio qdisc? No. was [ [LARTC] Sanity Check ]

2006-06-27 Thread Martin A. Brown
Mike, : I'm not trying to be obstinate, I'm just trying to understand : this more fully. But I sure appreciate the time you spent : answering my question. : : But, I'm still missing something. No worries--that's what mailing lists are for. A bit of back and forth. : You mention

VoIP using just prio qdisc? No. was [ [LARTC] Sanity Check ]

2006-06-26 Thread Martin A. Brown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Good morning, Mike, : I need a sanity check. I'm trying to setup my network to handle : VoIP. I'm thinking that all I need to do is prioritize the : realtime traffic above the interactive and bulk traffic. I see : so much discussion about

Re: VoIP using just prio qdisc? No. was [ [LARTC] Sanity Check ]

2006-06-26 Thread Mike Diehl
Martin, I'm not trying to be obstinate, I'm just trying to understand this more fully. But I sure appreciate the time you spent answering my question. But, I'm still missing something. You mention below that during a VoIP session, another user could start up a large, high bandwidth, transfer

[LARTC] Sanity Check

2006-06-25 Thread Mike Diehl
Hi all. I need a sanity check. I'm trying to setup my network to handle VoIP. I'm thinking that all I need to do is prioritize the realtime traffic above the interactive and bulk traffic. I see so much discussion about traffic shapping, but I don't THINK this is needed, right? I understand