You say that IMQ could be attached to a device to the incoming side ??
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Martin Devera wrote:
> With IMQ you can ;)
>
> > Make sure u can't actually SHARE your incoming bandwith. you can just
> > throttle it down (to gain more interactivity on a heavy loaded link)
>
> __
indeed. If someone want to volunteer docs I will give all neccessary
info ;)
devik
On 21 Mar 2002, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 10:11, Martin Devera wrote:
> > With IMQ you can ;)
>
> Except the lack of documentation makes me scared to use it (or try to
> figure it out). :)
>
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 10:11, Martin Devera wrote:
> With IMQ you can ;)
Except the lack of documentation makes me scared to use it (or try to
figure it out). :)
Jason.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/
For me ingress works great.
ok, i more or less copy/pasted from the "wondershaper" :)
I guess it's not good to have a rate of 8000bps AND a burst of 10k
I'm also not shure, if the iptables-marks get noticed, but it seems so,
as you said there is a shaping effect. but as your iptable-rule is so
With IMQ you can ;)
> Make sure u can't actually SHARE your incoming bandwith. you can just
> throttle it down (to gain more interactivity on a heavy loaded link)
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Ok,
what I really wanted was to prioritize some kinds of incoming traffic
(DNS or HTTP) (or penalyze some other, which is same), exactly for what
you say, "gain interactivity on a heavy loaded link"
but doing test, I saw this strange "non fairness sensation", which is
maybe problematic ??
That
the "wondershaper" by one of the authors of the LARTC-HOWTO:
http://lartc.org/HOWTO//cvs/2.4routing/output/2.4routing-15.html
at the very end of this html-page simply copy/paste the ingress-line and
the next line which is the u32 filter for the ingress-qdisc.
that worked perfect for me :)
> T
I reread your Subject line and noticed you meant SHARING. i always read
SHAPING.
Make sure u can't actually SHARE your incoming bandwith. you can just
throttle it down (to gain more interactivity on a heavy loaded link)
I hope we didn't missunderstand each other
Tobias
___
I've done my first test with ingress,
2 ftps, and I've seen that the bandwidth is not shared "very well".
From the point of view of a user, his transfer stops suddenly, and
restarts 20 seconds (or more!) later. Then the other has to wait !! I
observ a kind of feedback process, beeing the interv
