Hello
everybody,
I'm trying to set up netem on a SuSE box (kernel 2.6.16), but I'm having some weird problems, considering that on my Gentoo laptop (kernel 2.6.17) it worked
fine.
If I write:
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem delay 20ms loss 20%
and then try pinging another machine over eth0,
EC wrote:
Hi,
New to traffic shaping I would like to make some tests. It's for a
production server (fw), using 2.4.27 kernel.
Something is not clear to me about HTB... is the last stable version
included in the 2.4.27 kernel and iproute2 (iproute2-2.6.8-040823.tar.bz2) ?
Are there
Hi,
New to traffic shaping I would like to make some tests. It's for a
production server (fw), using 2.4.27 kernel.
Something is not clear to me about HTB... is the last stable version
included in the 2.4.27 kernel and iproute2 (iproute2-2.6.8-040823.tar.bz2) ?
Are there special patches to apply
Hi,
New to traffic shaping I would like to make some tests. It's for a
production server (fw), using 2.4.27 kernel.
Something is not clear to me about HTB... is the last stable version
included in the 2.4.27 kernel and iproute2 (iproute2-2.6.8-
040823.tar.bz2) ?
Are there special patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have a linuxbox running shorewall, and on the lan side nic I have multiple
networks, and ip's from both assigned to the nic. One network is private,
and the other is public ip's. I have a web server running on the firewall
with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 September 2002 01:07 am, Joseph Watson wrote:
Hello,
Sorry I have the wrong list here :)
- --
Regards
Joseph Watson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
hi,
So I have the following:
ROUTER 10.0.0.254
|
10.0.0.3(eth0)
MY_DEBIAN_RTR
209.52.x.126(eth1)
|
LAN (the 209.52.x.64/26 subnet)
I need to route the 209.52.x.64 subnet through MY_DEBIAN_RTR
and on to the telephone company router. I'd probably like
209.52.x to have it's own table (if that
pfifo is attached if not other specified. if no qdisc is attached to an
interface at all pfifo_fast will be used.
bye patrick
Mihai RUSU wrote:
Hi
If not ataching any qdisc disc to a cba/htb leaf class what does that
mean? There will be a default fifo style queue ? Or there will be no