Re: [LARTC] Stranger than IPTABLES?

2002-06-07 Thread Julián Muñoz
Mldonkey open many connections, so individually they are very slow. Maybe the TCP timeout is at the maximum (2minutes), so it can take several minutes to close a connection (maybe 5minutes). On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: > Wow. It is very interesting. Did you tried to read counters

Re: [LARTC] Stranger than IPTABLES?

2002-06-07 Thread Ciprian Niculescu
Martin Devera wrote: > > Wow. It is very interesting. Did you tried to read counters > in iptables -vL and compare counts ? Like to read value from > /proc/net/dev compare to count of packets at INPUT chain and > then compare with no of packets in DROP chains. > It could give us better picture wh

Re: [LARTC] Stranger than IPTABLES?

2002-06-07 Thread Martin Devera
Wow. It is very interesting. Did you tried to read counters in iptables -vL and compare counts ? Like to read value from /proc/net/dev compare to count of packets at INPUT chain and then compare with no of packets in DROP chains. It could give us better picture where are the packets going to. But

[LARTC] Stranger than IPTABLES?

2002-06-06 Thread josh
Hi there! This post is somehow connected with my other posts about problems with HTB. In fact - in my case it can be problem of linux kernel :-/? Ok, here is the hardware and software: Linux Debian working on classic pentium 120MHz. Kernel 2.4.18. MLDonkey is working for some period of time.