Re: [LARTC] These tc commands used to work... what's broken them?

2005-04-03 Thread Thomas Graf
* George Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-03-25 17:03 > > tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 8 default_index 0 > > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument This has been fixed in the latest version which is http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/iproute2/download/iproute2-2.6.11-0503

Re: [LARTC] These tc commands used to work... what's broken them?

2005-04-03 Thread Andy Furniss
George Adams wrote: I have a Gentoo Linux (kernel 2.6.11) server. Several months ago, I made a traffic shaping setup for my box (running a 2.4 kernel then) that worked beautifully. It gave high priority to SSH and RealAudio traffic, and put HTTP downloading traffic on a lower prio so they could o

Re: [LARTC] These tc commands used to work... what's broken them?

2005-04-03 Thread Corey Hickey
George Adams wrote: > I have a Gentoo Linux (kernel 2.6.11) server. Several months ago, I > made a traffic shaping setup for my box (running a 2.4 kernel then) > that worked beautifully. It gave high priority to SSH and RealAudio > traffic, and put HTTP downloading traffic on a lower prio so they

[LARTC] These tc commands used to work... what's broken them?

2005-03-31 Thread George Adams
I have a Gentoo Linux (kernel 2.6.11) server. Several months ago, I made a traffic shaping setup for my box (running a 2.4 kernel then) that worked beautifully. It gave high priority to SSH and RealAudio traffic, and put HTTP downloading traffic on a lower prio so they could only use what bandwid