Re: [LARTC] Using Julian Anastasov's 'routes' patches on 2.4 kernel in conjunction with IPSec

2007-07-03 Thread Julian Anastasov
Hello, On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Seba Tiponut wrote: The _updown script is only called when a tunnel is brough up or down, but the problem I am having is not related to a tunnel, but to routing before any tunnel gets established. I mean that even a configuration with only one tunnel

Re: [LARTC] Using Julian Anastasov's 'routes' patches on 2.4 kernel in conjunction with IPSec

2007-06-28 Thread Seba Tiponut
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 00:40, Julian Anastasov wrote: May be you have to replace your _updown script with one that supports ip route and ip rule commands instead of the old route tool. By this way you can use ip rule ... from LNET to RNET to properly route traffic for the negotiated

[LARTC] Using Julian Anastasov's 'routes' patches on 2.4 kernel in conjunction with IPSec

2007-06-25 Thread Seba Tiponut
Hello, I use Julian Anastasov 'routes' (to be more specific: static_routes, alt_routes and nf_reroute) patches on a 2.4.32 kernel. On the same host I run IPSec. I have discovered after a few hours of networking problems that, when IPSec is enabled on that patched kernel, inspecting packets with

Re: [LARTC] Using Julian Anastasov's 'routes' patches on 2.4 kernel in conjunction with IPSec

2007-06-25 Thread Julian Anastasov
Hello, On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Seba Tiponut wrote: I use Julian Anastasov 'routes' (to be more specific: static_routes, alt_routes and nf_reroute) patches on a 2.4.32 kernel. On the same host I run IPSec. I have discovered after a few hours of networking problems that, when IPSec is