Re: [lartc] Virtual Interface

2006-02-07 Thread Roger Singh
Mike, Thanks. I will try it.. I have not explained the puspose for this doing this - just to give you an idea I want to create around 200 virtual interfaces and send traffice through all the interfaces simulating traffic comming from different networks. Do youthink this approach will scale to

Re: [LARTC] Virtual Interface

2006-02-03 Thread Roger Singh
Thanks Ryan. VLAN will not for for me, I will check ebtables. BTW, I was thinking more on lines of MAC-VLAN. I could not find much information about it. I will really appriciate if someone can provide me some direction one this. Thanks R On 2/2/06, Ryan Castellucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You

Re: [lartc] Virtual Interface

2006-02-03 Thread list user
Hi Roger, [big snip: lost o.p.] There are a couple of different approaches you might try. One is to use uml-utilities' tunctl to create an ethernet tap. Another is to use the dummy interface. With either method you can bridge, route, configure as you would a physical device using ifconfig

[LARTC] Virtual Interface

2006-02-02 Thread Roger Singh
Hi Guys, I want to create multiple virtual interfaces on a system running linux 2.6. The main requirment being, to assign unique MAC address fo each of the virtual interfaces. I need to know, if this is possible and will really appriciate if someone can provide me pointer in this direction.

[LARTC] Virtual Interface

2006-02-02 Thread Ryan Castellucci
You can do this with vlans, but this may not be a suitable solution, as if you want to make them work normaly, you will need to tie this to a vlan capable switch. I don't belive that alias interfaces support setting seperate mac addresses, however, you might want to look at ebtables, it has some

RE: [LARTC] virtual interface

2004-01-05 Thread Aron Brand
Alen, : can i add HTB rule on virtual interface? : example: eth0:0 First, it's not really a virtual interface--it's just a convention from the old days of IP aliasing to have names like eth0:0. The IP exists and is active on an interface, eth0 in your case. The short answer is no. Traffic

Re: [LARTC] virtual interface

2004-01-05 Thread Roy
There is no need to use imq ant everything is easy to do anyway interface name is usefull only to attach qdisc to something and that all you need to clasify packets by source or destination ip antway if you have idea how to use imq there then just use your interface instead. also why it is so

[LARTC] virtual interface

2004-01-04 Thread alen sarkinovic
can i add HTB rule on virtual interface\ example: eth0:0 alens - Original Message - From: Stef Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: jayesh rathod [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 10:41 AM Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB filters - pls help me On Sunday 04 January 2004

Re: [LARTC] virtual interface

2004-01-04 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 05 January 2004 05:55, alen sarkinovic wrote: can i add HTB rule on virtual interface\ example: eth0:0 No. Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Linux as bandwidth manager http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net ___ LARTC