Re: [LARTC] Virus Scanners

2005-03-20 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi. Drag0n wrote: been sending virii e-mails, and no other e-mails, its an easy block. If he was actualy on this list, he would have responded to this thread in his own defense. Don't forget that some people don't read their mails every day. Some are enjoying the weekend, others are on holidays,

[LARTC] Virus Scanners

2005-03-18 Thread Robert Felber
Could please everyone setup his virus scanner to don't bounce virus mails? A solution is, to store the mail locally, and contact the sender manually, if it is that neccessary. Bouncing/Rejecting is no solution to save bandwidth since the whole mail already passed the the 1st reciving smtpd of the

Re: [LARTC] Virus Scanners

2005-03-18 Thread Drag0n
How about someone just blacklist [EMAIL PROTECTED] from sending e-mail to the list as his is the main sender? that or install a virii scanner on the listserv? Drag0n dragonatatlantacon.org On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 19:40 +0100, Robert Felber wrote: Could please everyone setup his virus scanner to

Re: [LARTC] Virus Scanners

2005-03-18 Thread David Hough
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 13:10 -0600, Drag0n wrote: On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 19:40 +0100, Robert Felber wrote: Could please everyone setup his virus scanner to don't bounce virus mails? A solution is, to store the mail locally, and contact the sender manually, if it is that neccessary.

Re: [LARTC] Virus Scanners

2005-03-18 Thread Robert Felber
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 01:10:11PM -0600, Drag0n wrote: How about someone just blacklist [EMAIL PROTECTED] from sending e-mail to the list as his is the main sender? that or install a virii scanner on the listserv? No, [EMAIL PROTECTED] must not be the original sender. Everyone could send a

Re: [LARTC] Virus Scanners

2005-03-18 Thread Drag0n
Normaly i would agree with you, but with as long as that address has been sending virii e-mails, and no other e-mails, its an easy block. If he was actualy on this list, he would have responded to this thread in his own defense. since it would be a block from sending only, it would kill one