Re: [LARTC] burst per connection or filter on packet numbers

2002-11-23 Thread Walter Haidinger
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Marcus Blomenkamp wrote: > You could try the WRR (weighted-round-robin) scheduler. It's not yet included > into the standard kernel sources, so you've got to patch them. Google should > help. Thanks for the hint! I'll have a look at it. FYI, it is referenced for the lartc ho

Re: [LARTC] burst per connection or filter on packet numbers

2002-11-23 Thread Marcus Blomenkamp
Am Freitag, 22. November 2002 23:36 schrieb Walter Haidinger: > > I'd like to favour beginning connections (not just the starting packets, > but the first, say, 100 packets) _while_ there already established > connections which prevent recharging of the htb bursts. > > I've already experimented wit

Re: [LARTC] burst per connection or filter on packet numbers

2002-11-22 Thread Walter Haidinger
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Stef Coene wrote: > Why not doing with htb? It has a nice burst parameter that does exactly what > you want. Not exactly. If I understand the htb users guide correctly, then the bursts only apply if there is the chance that they can recharge (i.e. there is some period withou

Re: [LARTC] burst per connection or filter on packet numbers

2002-11-22 Thread Stef Coene
On Friday 22 November 2002 19:32, Walter Haidinger wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like put the first n packets of a connection into a seperate class > like having a burst for each connection. > > The netfilter nth patch doesn't quite do this as it > a. only matches a single packet count and > b. works on the

[LARTC] burst per connection or filter on packet numbers

2002-11-22 Thread Walter Haidinger
Hi! I'd like put the first n packets of a connection into a seperate class like having a burst for each connection. The netfilter nth patch doesn't quite do this as it a. only matches a single packet count and b. works on the rule instead the connection count. I'm thinking of something like: i