Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/04/2007 21:29:33:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for the info. First of all, in order to use the nth match you
need
to patch your kernel using patch-o-matic.
I think nth is in kernel now as part of the statistic match.
Andy.
I was
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 April 2007 09:01
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] equalize / ecmp not working as expected in 2.6 vs 2.4
Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/04/2007 21:29:33:
[EMAIL
Hi,
With kernel 2.4 I was able to use equalize to send our outgoing packets to
two different routers (our isp supports this setup), like this:
ip route add default src ip.a.dd.rr equalize nexthop via router1 weight 1
nexthop via router2 weight 1
The two routes were used equally on a per packet
Hi Andrew,
I would use a combination with iptables. You should mark the packets, for
example using average or n-th, and then use ip rules to send half of the
packets vía one router and the rest to the other router according to the
marks you set with iptables.
Just a question ¿ dont you have
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 April 2007 15:17
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] equalize / ecmp not working as expected in 2.6 vs 2.4
Hi Andrew,
I would use a combination with iptables. You should mark the
Andrew Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/04/2007 16:34:52:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 April 2007 15:17
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] equalize / ecmp not working as expected in 2.6 vs
2.4
Hi
