Re: [LARTC] ip route nat madness.

2004-11-13 Thread Peter Volkov Alexandrovich
Hello. I need your help. The problem is I can not make route nat working with kernel 2.6 although in 2.4 everthing works perfectly. If this is the wrong list to ask question about this, please poke me in the right one. So. I have router with two network cards: eth0(192.168.1.10) and eth1 (192.

[LARTC] ip route nat madness.

2004-10-26 Thread Петр Волков
Hello list. I may become crazy without your help. I'm not nubie, but... All worked with 2.4 kernel, but when I have to move to 2.6.8.1 it's not. I'm using "ip route nat 231.222.222.111 via 172.16.1.13" to substitute inet address 231.222.222.111 on 172.16.1.13 during routing. Look at the output: