:58
To: Denis Ovsienko
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] iptables CLASSIFY vs fwmark?
My observation also, but one example shows using fwmark in the
PREROUTING chain while CLASSIFY can be used in POSTROUTING only
(correct?). My experience with tc at this point is limited but
My observation also, but one example shows using fwmark in the
PREROUTING chain while CLASSIFY can be used in POSTROUTING only
(correct?). My experience with tc at this point is limited but
sometimes added flexibility is useful, even if it's a little more effort.
Edwin
Denis Ovsienko wrote:
> Could someone comment on the benefits of using CLASSIFY vs fwmark (or
> vice versa) in iptables?
One benefit I see is that one avoids extra filters, this can be useful
with lots of classes.
--
DO4-UANIC
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.n
Could someone comment on the benefits of using CLASSIFY vs fwmark (or
vice versa) in iptables?
I'm getting ready to implement some basic tc for VoIP and most of the
examples seem to use the (older?) fwmark syntax. Should I convert these
to CLASSIFY? Can the two syntaxes be mixed? Also with
