Thanks all for your answer. I'll see how it will behave in practice and
let you know.
Thanks again,
Alex
Peter Surda wrote:
Alexandru Matei schrieb:
Ok, maybe I was not clear enough.
Yes you were :-)
What I'm interested in is the order of passing throught filters. WRR
has an built-in f
Peter Surda wrote:
at.matei schrieb:
Hi all,
hi
Can I use wrr with 8 classes each as leaf for each htb child?
Yes, but ESFQ may be better. I had stability problems when using more
than 1 WRR per interface, but it is possible that it's fixed now.
Furthermore, WRR is designed for lar
Gabriel wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:13:06 +0200, at.matei wrote:
Hi all,
Here's the situation.
I have 80 users sharing a internet link of 5Mb link.
The users are grouped in /29 ip addr classes so I have 10
classes of users
Maybe I'm getting this wrong, but how can you have 8
user
at.matei schrieb:
Hi all,
hi
Can I use wrr with 8 classes each as leaf for each htb child?
Yes, but ESFQ may be better. I had stability problems when using more
than 1 WRR per interface, but it is possible that it's fixed now.
Furthermore, WRR is designed for large numbers so it is an ov
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:13:06 +0200, at.matei wrote:
> Hi all,
> Here's the situation.
> I have 80 users sharing a internet link of 5Mb link.
> The users are grouped in /29 ip addr classes so I have 10
classes of users
Maybe I'm getting this wrong, but how can you have 8
users/class in a /29 subne
Hi all,
Here's the situation.
I have 80 users sharing a internet link of 5Mb link.
The users are grouped in /29 ip addr classes so I have 10 classes of users
I want to create a root htb, then 10 htb childs each with 0.5Mb
bandwidth. The traffic will be directed to each class using tc filters.
Now