Hello.
this is Kuznetsov's point of view of 1997 :)
I think it might change. Why not to implement this feature as optional
thing, like syn cookies, that you are to enable. Sometimes this is a
security hole, but sometimes - not. I need this to do a tunnel between two
networks with windoze inside.
Hello All,
What your are trying to do is called "directed broadcast", and the linux
networking gods believe it is evil (i.e. a security hole) and should not
be implemented by routers. See
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/net/9707.3/0030.html for example.
Eran.
Poltorak Ser
Hello
but packets are going To their subnetwork. then m.n.o.w sends packet to
a.b.c.255 gateways other than a.b.c.1 doesn't know that a.b.c.255 is a
broadcast. it's only a.b.c.1 (m.n.o.p) who discards the packet
may be I should redraw my pic.
a.b.c.0/24,brd+ -[ a.b.c.1, m.n.o.p ]-m.n.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 04:35:16AM +0400, Poltorak Serguei wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I would like to route broadcast messages.
> For now, if I ping a.b.c.255 from m.n.o.w the packet is passing through
> each router, except the last, a.b.c.1 (m.n.o.p, other "external" address)
> and only he replys to th
Hello.
I would like to route broadcast messages.
For now, if I ping a.b.c.255 from m.n.o.w the packet is passing through
each router, except the last, a.b.c.1 (m.n.o.p, other "external" address)
and only he replys to that packet, but not from a.b.c.1, he does it from
m.n.o.p address (logic, it's
