FW: FW: [LARTC] Static ip addresses/aliases previously (my mistake) htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

2004-07-06 Thread Chris Bolton
Brillient, cheers for that, appears to be approching 5.30 so I'll have to read through it tomorrow morning. First glance it appears its exactly want I need to impliment. I've learnt so much today with all this its untrue. Thanks to all whos helped. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PR

Re: FW: FW: [LARTC] Static ip addresses/aliases previously (my mistake) htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

2004-07-06 Thread Ed Wildgoose
Chris Bolton wrote: eth1 & eth2 are both connected to the EN5861 router. I've done that because I couldn't work out any other way to use the static IP address that out ISP have given us. Aha, this is a config question. You can just add as many ip addresses to each physical card as

FW: FW: [LARTC] Static ip addresses/aliases previously (my mistake) htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

2004-07-06 Thread Chris Bolton
>>eth1 & eth2 are both connected to the EN5861 router. I've done that >>because I couldn't work out any other way to use the static IP address >>that out ISP have given us. >> > >Aha, this is a config question. You can just add as many ip addresses to each physical card as you like. I forget