Francis Brosnan Blazquez wrote:
Hi,
I've been implementing a load balancing solution using CONNMARK, based
on solution described by Luciano Ruete at [1]. Gracias por el post y
por
apuntar en la dirección correcta Luciano!
Once implemented, I've found that due to some reason packets aren't
of one,though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salim S I
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 2:15 PM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Load balancing using connmark
Francis Brosnan Blazquez wrote:
Hi,
I've been implementing
El jue, 10-05-2007 a las 16:01 +0800, Salim S I escribió:
Hi Salim,
Thanks for your reply,
On closer look, I am wrong about shorewall. It seems to be a different
approach to load balancing. They connmark the incoming packets from
WAN, rather than outgoing packets. I think it should work well,
hi people
Francis Brosnan Blazquez wrote:
I've been implementing a load balancing solution using CONNMARK, based
After giving a try during several days, I've found that another firewall
solution, shorewall [2], implements built-in load balacing for free by
using the following set of
Salim S I wrote:
Francis Brosnan Blazquez wrote:
Hi,
I've been implementing a load balancing solution using CONNMARK, based
on solution described by Luciano Ruete at [1]. Gracias por el post y por
apuntar en la dirección correcta Luciano!
Once implemented, I've found that
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
...
In the case of _local_ traffic - it becomes even trickier. The problem
is that when sockets are created they already have a source IP (the
kernel determines that by looking at the default routing table, your
marks do not exist yet).
This is misleading - it will
: [LARTC] Load balancing using connmark
Salim S I wrote:
Francis Brosnan Blazquez wrote:
Hi,
I've been implementing a load balancing solution using CONNMARK,
based
on solution described by Luciano Ruete at [1]. Gracias por el post y
por
apuntar en la dirección correcta Luciano
Is there a good [single?] document explaining all of this and more?
What the kernel does in POST vs PRE with respect to iproute2 and
netfilter with CONNMARK and etc?
Thank you,
David
Salim S I wrote:
Let me explain why the marking is done in POSTROUTING.
[...]
Francis Brosnan Blazquez wrote:
Hi,
I've been implementing a load balancing solution using CONNMARK, based
on solution described by Luciano Ruete at [1]. Gracias por el post y por
apuntar en la dirección correcta Luciano!
Once implemented, I've found that due to some reason packets aren't
