RE: [LARTC] Routing question

2006-09-06 Thread Leigh Sharpe
I'll try that on-list this time.. An iptables rule in the FORWARD chain to DROP all packets to/from that network? Using the FORWARD chain should allow access from the server's IP address, but not allowing any forwarded traffic. Regards, Leigh Leigh Sharpe Network System

Re: [LARTC] routing question

2004-11-01 Thread Rene Gallati
routing wrote: my current router and default gateway for my network is 192.168.0.4 (with one interface eth0) 192.168.0.8 is a smoothwall with a vpn set up to 192.168.15.0 I need to get to a network at 192.168.16.0/24 at the through the gateway at 192.168.15.254 Machines on 192.168.15.0 can ping

Re: [LARTC] routing question

2004-11-01 Thread routing
my current router and default gateway for my network is 192.168.0.4 (with one interface eth0) 192.168.0.8 is a smoothwall with a vpn set up to 192.168.15.0 I need to get to a network at 192.168.16.0/24 at the through the gateway at 192.168.15.254 Machines on 192.168.15.0 can ping those on 192.16

Re: [LARTC] Routing question

2003-06-06 Thread Leigh Waldie
>>I found this to be excellent... >> >>http://www.linuxpowered.com/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html >> >> >That's the exact same thing I used, but I don't have separate ethernet >cards, which this set up relies on. Both my routers are on a switch, >along with my server, so eve

Re: [LARTC] Routing question

2003-06-06 Thread Leigh Waldie
> Hi, > > I was wondering if somebody could assist me in the following > > I have a lan with a mail server, a fixed outside ip address leased line > router at 10.1.1.1, and a dynamic outside ip address adsl router at 10.1.1.5 > > Our linux mail server always used to have the leased line router at >