I had the same problem. Had to disable ipsec interfaces to make things work. Though the routing rules were in correct order, packets went to ipsec interface. Finally, I removed the patch.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Seba Tiponut > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 7:48 PM > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: [LARTC] Using Julian Anastasov's 'routes' patches on 2.4 kernel > inconjunction with IPSec > > Hello, > > I use Julian Anastasov 'routes' (to be more specific: static_routes, > alt_routes and nf_reroute) patches on a 2.4.32 kernel. On the same host I > run > IPSec. I have discovered after a few hours of networking problems that, > when IPSec is enabled on that patched kernel, inspecting packets with > tcpdump > while arping-ing a host from a network physically connected to this > machine, > the arp requests show up on the ipsecX interface instead of the ethX > interface. When IPSec isn't running, Julian's code works fine. I suspect > it > has something to do with having two interfaces with the same data (ipsecX > mirroring the configuration from ethX). > Can anyone give me a hint on how could I solve this problem? I've googled > a > long time to no avail and I don't have the necessary skills to debug the > networking code from kernel. > > Cheers, > Seba. > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list > LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
