Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

2004-07-05 Thread Catalin BOIE
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Glen Mabey wrote: I'm getting the following error/warning at some point in my config script, and I'm not sure which class it is referring to. htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?! What qdisc is attached to this class? I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving

RE: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

2004-07-05 Thread Chris Bolton
Hi all, Our ISP has given us 5 static IP address plus one router IP address and I was wondering if I could get rid of their stupid EN5861 router and set up the linux machine to handle all the static addresses and routing. I figured I'd have to set up alises for other IP addresses eg ifconfig

Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

2004-07-05 Thread Ed Wildgoose
Our ISP has given us 5 static IP address plus one router IP address and I was wondering if I could get rid of their stupid EN5861 router and set up the linux machine to handle all the static addresses and routing. I figured I'd have to set up alises for other IP addresses eg ifconfig eth0:0

Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

2004-07-05 Thread Glen Mabey
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 09:18:11AM +0300, Catalin BOIE wrote: On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Glen Mabey wrote: I'm getting the following error/warning at some point in my config script, and I'm not sure which class it is referring to. htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?! What qdisc is

Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!

2004-07-05 Thread Catalin BOIE
Yes, that's what I was trying to ask below. I'm still trying to figure out which class (in the qdisc:classid format) the error message is referring to. It's about class 1:7. So, since I'm not sure which class it is (and I have several htb qdiscs; oh, I just realized that I neglected to mention