Re: [LARTC] which is more appropiate for a ciber-cafe LAN ?

2004-06-22 Thread Jason Boxman
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 10:50, Andreas Klauer wrote: > Am Tuesday 22 June 2004 16:18 schrieb ThE LinuX_KiD: > > FairNat ? > > http://www.metamorpher.de/fairnat/ > > You tell us what works best for you - > > I honestly don't know how good or bad my script will perform > for you; I only tested it in

RE: [LARTC] which is more appropiate for a ciber-cafe LAN ?

2004-06-22 Thread ThE LinuX_KiD
I see 2 differences betwen FairNat and JiM's Qos Script. 1) Jim uses esfq instead a HTB by host in order to fairness. But, is esfq really fairness ? In my tests with esfq, I can't get fairness between hosts with esfq. But, with esfq , I don't need to configure client by client. 2) Jim uses

Re: [LARTC] which is more appropiate for a ciber-cafe LAN ?

2004-06-22 Thread Andreas Klauer
Am Tuesday 22 June 2004 16:18 schrieb ThE LinuX_KiD: > FairNat ? > http://www.metamorpher.de/fairnat/ You tell us what works best for you - I honestly don't know how good or bad my script will perform for you; I only tested it in small networks (5 clients at home). I got some positive feedback f