t; From: Andy Furniss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 6:17 PM
> To: Tim Enos
> Cc: 'Christian Benvenuti'; lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: PQ questions
>
> Tim Enos wrote:
> > Cool,
> >
> > Thanks Christian! I'
Tim Enos wrote:
Cool,
Thanks Christian! I'm wishing that all of those same params showed up in the
output without having to run anything. No problem. Should it matter that I'm
using an emulated interface?
Quite possibly - using prio on real devices still can appear not to work
until you have
Salim S I wrote:
I tested on wireless link. It could give a maximum of 45Mbps. And I sent
30Mbps of both low prio and high prio traffic. Total of 60Mbps.
My test was done with UDP, using tcpdump. When I increased the bandwidth
to 40Mbps each, the high priority class got lesser bandwidth.
Maybe
d.
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Benvenuti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 2:57 PM
> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
> Cc: Tim Enos
> Subject: RE: [LARTC] Re: PQ questions
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:31 -0400, Tim Enos wrote
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:31 -0400, Tim Enos wrote:
> Please send me the exact config by which you got all those params in the
> output (especially backlog 0b 35p)... I just do not see that in mine.
The configuration is the same as yours, with the difference that I have
eth0 instead of eml_te
Please send me the exact config by which you got all those params in the
output (especially backlog 0b 35p)... I just do not see that in mine.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Christian Benvenuti
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 3:32 AM
>
Hi Christian,
> #tc -s -d qdisc list dev eth1
>
> qdisc prio 1: root bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> Sent 85357186 bytes 59299 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 35p requeues 0
> +-> This field is not initialize
I tested on wireless link. It could give a maximum of 45Mbps. And I sent
30Mbps of both low prio and high prio traffic. Total of 60Mbps.
My test was done with UDP, using tcpdump. When I increased the bandwidth
to 40Mbps each, the high priority class got lesser bandwidth. (maybe the
effect of the kn
Slightly offtopic... Has anyone really experienced starving of low
priority traffic with PRIO qdisc?
In my setup, I never achieved that, though I also wanted exactly that
situation. I gave both the classes same amount of traffic at the same
time. High prio got more bandwidth, but no starvation, eve
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the help. Please see my in-line comments:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Christian Benvenuti
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 4:44 PM
> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
> Subject: [LARTC] Re: PQ questions
>
> Hi,
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
