On 03/13/2013 11:13 AM, Jeroen Vermeulen wrote:
On 03/13/2013 09:37 PM, Curtis Hovey wrote:
All Hail William and Steve for bringing Lp to its lowest number of
oopses and timeouts in 6 years.
I never thought I'd see the day. Thanks, guys, and congratuliations!
+1
Gary
http://codesinger.blogspot.com/2012/12/yellow-squad-weekly-topics-december-14.html
We are working on the Juju GUI.
IRC nicks indicate the person who raised the issue.
• Makyo: the GUI can break the charm
• bcsaller: Write user stories as functional tests: improv plus Selenium
• bcsaller: card
On 09/21/2012 03:54 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:41 AM, William Grant
william.gr...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
WebOps have today finished setting up parallel testing in buildbot.
buildbot-poll has been updated to know about the new builders, and I've
confirmed that
Hi all.
Unfortunately, IS priorities haven't aligned to get parallel testing
deployed yet. Our squad has been assigned to move on to our next
project, starting Monday of next week. We have an important deadline to
reach for our next project, and will need to focus on that.
It will fall to
On 08/27/2012 04:55 PM, Brad Crittenden wrote:
Hi,
As a by-product of the work the Yellow Squad has been doing to parallelize the
Launchpad test suite, we've created a tool called 'lpsetup' that replaces the
rocketfuel-setup scripts but with lots of new functionality.
You can use lpsetup to
Project report (Laura, this is the best link to use, thank you :-) ):
http://codesinger.blogspot.com/2012/08/yellow-squad-weekly-project-report_17.html
Topics:
http://codesinger.blogspot.com/2012/08/yellow-squad-weekly-topics-august-17.html
Project report summary:
* We're still hiring for
Project report
http://codesinger.blogspot.com/2012/08/yellow-squad-weekly-project-report.html
Topics
http://codesinger.blogspot.com/2012/08/yellow-squad-weekly-topics-august-10.html
(no tricks section this week)
Project report Summary:
* A vacation kept one weekly report from being written,
Yay!! Congratulations, Francesco; and thank you very much, Raphaël.
Gary
On Aug 13, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Raphaël Badin raphael.ba...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce that Francesco frankban Banconi is now a graduated
reviewer. From now on, he will be the reviewer on duty
(Sorry for being late to get the mail out!)
= Project Report =
http://codesinger.blogspot.com/2012/07/yellow-squad-weekly-project-report-july_20.html
Summary:
* This was gmb's last week with us. Farewell from Yellow squad, and
best wishes for leading Green squad!
* We're still hiring for
= Project Report =
http://codesinger.blogspot.com/2012/07/yellow-squad-weekly-project-report-july_13.html
Summary:
* Parallel tests are running very well this week, with 37 successful
runs in a row so far...even though we haven't changed anything.
* The parallel testing machines in the data
I'm a bit behind on this, but here it is finally. This week I divided
them up into three posts. I'm just going to summarize and link them
here, rather than copying them into a difficult to read and
exceptionally long email.
= Project status =
Summary: We made some good progress, but this week
On blog:
http://codesinger.blogspot.com/2012/07/yellow-squad-weekly-retrospective.html
Headlines
Project report (now divided into status and goals sections)
Tricks
* gary_poster: how can code determine if it is being run within an LXC
container?
* benji: use -s flag to combine nosetests and
Headlines
Project plan
Action Items
New tricks
* gary_poster: when you think of something to share for the weekly
retrospective call, why not write it on the wiki page
* gary_poster: When starting a new project, look at our checklist and jml's
* gary_poster: When apt-get fails...
* benji: bzr
Hi John and all.
The webops folks alerted us of a codebrowse problem today. Things seem
to have settled down so they have filed a bug rather than started an
incident, but if things get worse they will yell for help...and
meanwhile, we have something to investigate.
Hi all. I have two small unofficial LEPs ready for comments. We might
be able to get to them. I hope we will. :-)
https://dev.launchpad.net/LEP/LaunchpadJujuCharmForDevs
Make a Juju charm that can support casual/quick Launchpad development
and one-off parallel testing (as opposed to automatic
On 06/18/2012 08:23 AM, Jonathan Lange wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@canonical.com
wrote:
Hi Jono. I hope the retrospective goes well. We'd be very happy to
hear your ideas on changes and improvements and experiments. (I still
need to write up today's
Pretty version
http://codesinger.blogspot.com/2012/06/yellow-squad-weekly-retrospective_18.html
Headlines
Attendance
Project plan
Action items
New tricks
gmb: beware: zope.testing will occasionally swallow ImportErrors
benji: beware: be careful when powering off lxc containers
benji:
Hi Jono. I hope the retrospective goes well. We'd be very happy to
hear your ideas on changes and improvements and experiments. (I still
need to write up today's retrospective but I'm out of time ATM.)
I'll update the lists as you suggest.
I'm not sure yet exactly how I'll integrate the Covey
Pretty version:
https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/1RNYn2XLJ9FTC7kmM0-5t_XyAzRSj2-ne_T-RqemP0bo/edit#
Parallel test project
Status update for June 13, 2012
Overview
In our last report, we had regressed to no passing (green) test runs.
We are back to reasonably good statistics
Headlines
New tricks:
frankban: the fixtures test fixture package.
benji: debugging output streams
gary_poster: killing lots of lxc ephemerals is annoying, but I have a
band-aid
gmb gary_poster: bisect and conquer for test isolation problems
benji: escaping from the lxc login
Hi all. I'm telling Francesco that we've given this LEP time enough to
cook, and encouraging him to proceed. Thanks!
Gary
On 05/31/2012 02:32 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
On 05/21/2012 03:09 PM, Francesco Banconi wrote:
Hi all,
I've written a LEP draft about Launchpad setup scripts improvement
As an experiment, I'll do what Elliot suggested.
I'll blog on my pre-existing personal blog (e.g.
http://codesinger.blogspot.com/2012/06/yellow-squad-weekly-retrospective.html).
This is aggregated into http://voices.canonical.com/ . I'll send out
emails with headlines at the top, link, and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2012 09:37 AM, Aaron Bentley wrote:
On 12-06-01 01:54 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
(We then discussed lightweight branches and colocated branches
to make sure everyone knew what they were and how to use them.)
What do you mean by lightweight
Summary:
* If you are writing code in a test to wait for something to happen in
wall-clock time...
* make sure that you are only doing this in setup or teardown, to
prevent a permanent hang in the test suite; and
* make sure that you provide a really generous amount of time--say,
10 or
= Preamble =
Is anybody out there?
If you read this email, please give us feedback on how we could make our
communication better. We've gotten some positive feedback on these
emails, but also some hints that they are falling into the tl;dr trap
for some or most people.
Do you have some ideas
On 06/01/2012 02:25 PM, Elliot Murphy wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@canonical.com wrote:
If you read this email, please give us feedback on how we could make our
communication better. We've gotten some positive feedback on these
emails, but also some
On 05/21/2012 03:09 PM, Francesco Banconi wrote:
Hi all,
I've written a LEP draft about Launchpad setup scripts improvement.
The Yellow squad, as you already know, is working on the parallel tests
project, which uses https://launchpad.net/lpsetup as part of its process
to create the
On 05/31/2012 05:40 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@canonical.com wrote:
We put his thoughts, which we have largely incorporated; and some
implementation notes on separate pages, so the Thoughts? section is
largely blank once again. Thoughts
Also readable in google docs:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12zW9D79nxHrY0KCjfETpS6RLrjcOo95MygenBfClX04/edit
Parallel test project
Status update for May 30, 2012
Overview
As warned by the Yellow retrospective meeting minutes from this past
Friday, this was a tough couple of weeks for the
= Attendance =
The gang's all here: bac, benji, frankban, gmb, gary_poster
= Project plan =
- We have two 24 core machines coming, one each for devel and dbdevel: yay
- We have not tested regularly with that many cores: boo. We need to
start testing regularly with 32 core EC2 machines when we
On 05/21/2012 03:09 PM, Francesco Banconi wrote:
Hi all,
I've written a LEP draft about Launchpad setup scripts improvement.
The Yellow squad, as you already know, is working on the parallel tests
project, which uses https://launchpad.net/lpsetup as part of its process
to create the
On 05/21/2012 03:09 PM, Francesco Banconi wrote:
Hi all,
I've written a LEP draft about Launchpad setup scripts improvement.
The Yellow squad, as you already know, is working on the parallel tests
project, which uses https://launchpad.net/lpsetup as part of its process
to create the
On 05/21/2012 10:03 PM, Timothy Chavez wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:09 PM, Francesco Banconi wrote:
Hi all,
I've written a LEP draft about Launchpad setup scripts improvement.
The Yellow squad, as you already know, is working on the parallel tests
project, which uses https://launchpad.net/lpsetup
= Attendance =
benji, gmb, gary_poster
apologies from frankban and bac, though frankban pre-supplied some notes
for the meeting.
= Project plan review =
* fewer, more exciting test failures
* we need to explore the new cohosting plans in order to inform the
purchasing plans
= Tricks =
On 05/18/2012 10:32 AM, Gary Poster wrote:
One possible solution
might be a week timer for kanban cards that are waiting on other
people--if a card doesn’t move, ping in some way. gary_poster requested
this kind of feature from leankitkanban a few weeks ago and got no
reply.
Actually
On 05/08/2012 02:11 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@canonical.com wrote:
Stuart, thank you for the alert. When is production scheduled to switch
to 9.1?
It isn't scheduled yet. Everything is ready to go, but we are just
waiting on everyone
On 05/06/2012 06:16 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
Hi.
Devs will need to switch over to PostgreSQL 9.1 - our first landing
is happening with sampledata generated from PG 9.1. As usual,
sampledata diffs are huge when generated by different PostgreSQL
versions so to avoid unnecessary huge commits
= Attendance =
Brad, Benji, Gary
(Francesco swap day, Graham Product Summit/UDS)
= Project status =
Francis approved: when we get a 90% rate of green test runs, we will
start work on stretch goals. The stretch goal will get a WIP limit of
two cards, and we will continue to work on the test
If you read this message in the next 8 hours or so, you might have fun
going to
http://ec2-107-22-105-209.compute-1.amazonaws.com:8010/waterfall
and seeing the parallel tests run on a juju-ified ec2 buildbot set up.
Robert thought all the devs might get a kick out of seeing it, so here
it
= Attendance =
full house (bac, benji, frankban, gmb, gary_poster)
= Project plan =
no change.
Discussed availability:
* Benji is out Mon Tues of next week, and Wed-Fri of following week
* Francesco is out Tuesday and Wednesday of next week
* Graham is unavailable for all practical
Thank you for filing this bug.
While we do want Launchpad to run on Precise, and this bug is good to
have to track that desire, you might be interested in running Launchpad
in LXC (https://dev.launchpad.net/Running/LXC) which several LP
developers use on Precise; or using a full-fledged Lucid VM
Attending: benji, frankban, gmb, gary_poster
Apologies: bac
= Project plan =
We're waiting on IS fixing bugs. We all knew this.
= Tricks learned =
benji: re-remembered apt-get build-dep: get all build dependencies.
Nice for Python packages. Worked well to get dependencies for
It's Friday! Oops.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
On 04/06/12 03:40, Stuart Bishop wrote:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Gary Postergary.pos...@canonical.com wrote:
I'm seeing these pretty consistently on parallel test runs. It seems to
affect both test environments. I filed bug 974632.
Have we considered dropping Memcached? Last I
On 04/09/12 10:20, Deryck Hodge wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Gary Postergary.pos...@canonical.com wrote:
On 04/06/12 03:40, Stuart Bishop wrote:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Gary Postergary.pos...@canonical.com
wrote:
I'm seeing these pretty consistently on parallel test
= Meta =
* Changed name of this meeting/email from postmortem to retrospective.
* Had meeting Thursday because gary_poster is out tomorrow (also gmb
frankban).
= Attendance =
* bac, gmb, gary_poster
* benji sick
* frankban holiday
= Project status =
* Missed our biweekly call
On 03/23/12 10:07, Deryck Hodge wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Aaron Bentleyaa...@canonical.com wrote:
On 12-03-23 06:20 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, William Grant
william.gr...@canonical.com wrote:
python-memcached was upgraded a week ago, so it's
On 03/30/12 17:18, curtis Hovey wrote:
Hi Gary, et al.
On 03/30/2012 11:39 AM, Gary Poster wrote:
* We are far behind on zope eggs. Catching up will be expensive, and
it is difficult to be motivated given the low activity/participation of
that project.
I am interested in updating
= Introduction for Launchpad devs =
Yellow squad has had a weekly postmortem call for many months
now--perhaps more than a year now.
The purpose is to identify successes, problems, and useful tricks; to
share them; and to see if we can problem solve and identify action
items. The call
(This is a repackaged version of an excerpt from the weekly yellow
postmortem minutes I sent to the list earlier today. If you've read
that email, you've read the meat of this. Responding to this mail for
this topic might be easier for everyone to follow.)
Yellow squad recently had to
On 03/30/12 11:59, Aaron Bentley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12-03-30 11:17 AM, Gary Poster wrote:
* Suggested process change: never patch eggs; fork branches if you
must, and make eggs from them.
I thought that this was already our policy:
https
On 03/30/12 16:27, Robert Collins wrote:
I have a few questions inspired by the events that lead to at least
two of our forks, and various experiences in Ubuntu.
How do we preserve our velocity while working with upstream? Do we
wait for upstream to be totally happy before we move forward? Do
FWIW, I started looking at this today, but didn't get to the end.
versions.cfg needed to be updated--looks like a few older packages are
no longer provided, which is a bit disturbing in the big picture but
irrelevant here, once we adjust.
=== modified file 'versions.cfg'
--- versions.cfg
Hi Martin.
We haven't announced setuplxc as a developer tool, AFAIK, even though it
has had a commit or two in that direction, so I was somewhat surprised
to hear that it was being used for that outside of our squad. I guess I
shouldn't have been. So, first off, here's a warning for
Date: 2012-03-07
Chair: gary
= Attendance =
* Curtis Hovey
* Deryck Hodge
* Francis Lacoste
* Gary Poster
* Matt Revell
* Julian Edwards
* Robert Collins
== Apologies ==
(None)
= This week in numbers =
The week in numbers:
Escalated bugs
Fixed: 0, New: 0, Backlog: 8
Regression
On 02/09/12 12:41, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Gary Postergary.pos...@canonical.com wrote:
On 02/06/12 17:31, Robert Collins wrote:
So - who would be happy (and who would not) with a LOC rule like the one
above?
Something I would like to keep/renew is Launchpad's
On 02/06/12 17:57, Steve Kowalik wrote:
On 07/02/12 09:06, Robert Collins wrote:
I propose that we declare sourcecode/ deprecated effective immediately
(this means no new stuff in there at all). I would then file bugs for
the things that need to move out of sourcecode, and we can get to them
as
On 02/03/12 11:19, Aaron Bentley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12-02-03 04:30 AM, Ian Booth wrote:
I've been doing a bit of investigation on running the Launchpad
test suite in a canonistack instance. Andrew Glen-Young has been
awesome in helping me get access to an
On 02/03/12 13:20, Aaron Bentley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12-02-03 11:30 AM, Gary Poster wrote:
This sounds quite a lot like the scripts test farm uses to
configure a Launchpad instance. Have you had a look at it?
bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~abentley/+junk
Hey Stuart. As a follow-on to my other email about Launchpad-on-Lucid
being broken because of the new postgresql-common in our PPA,
Launchpad-on-Precise is also broken.
This combination is broken because launchpad-database-dependencies
depends on postgresql-8.4 but we don't have 8.4
On 01/31/12 16:31, Stuart Bishop wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Gary Postergary.pos...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi Stuart. We were working today on our parallel testing project and ran
into a problem that postgresql-common was not installing in Lucid, when it
had been doing fine just
: Gary Poster gary.pos...@canonical.com
The problem we're having is that translation statistics are
intermittently not being updated. There have been problems with
translation statistics for a while, but this seems related to a recent
change I was tasked with.
The old way: when a translation
On 12/19/2011 01:53 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@canonical.com
wrote:
Thanks Rob. I agree with your general observations. We have wondered if a
larger rethinking of our modeling would lead to a better design, eventually.
We've even
Despite the performance issues that Launchpad's REST approach has
brought us, in my mind REST+JSON is still the best baseline
communications approach for web services, and for the back-end of JS
browser applications. We can learn from Launchpad's experience and make
sure that REST operations are
Anyone (Aaron?) have any ideas on what we can do to help them?
Gary
Original Message
Subject: [Launchpad-users] Request from Leo's owner to fix the
leo-editor trunk (or trunk2) branch
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:22:15 -0500
From: Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com
To:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/22/2011 12:01 PM, curtis Hovey wrote:
On 12/22/2011 11:43 AM, Gary Poster wrote:
Anyone (Aaron?) have any ideas on what we can do to help them?
Gary
Original Message Subject: [Launchpad-users]
Request from Leo's owner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Curtis. I replied to Edward.
Gary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk7zcqsACgkQptJosaN9z//lCgCeOj4qeNk7wkMOrvtFGztmqOLR
Alert:
The yellow squad has a db branch that needs to be landed asap when we
return (r11239 of db-stable). We are accumulating branches that depend
on the new table it creates. We'll be really eager to get this deployed
once we return in January (or sooner if that's possible).
Question:
to help Edward?
Thanks,
Gary
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Gary Poster
gary.pos...@canonical.com wrote:
I am Edward Ream, the owner of the Leo project. Launchpad has
been
great for
the Leo project, but recently we have run into problems due to a
mistaken commit of a huge file. Deleting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/22/2011 03:04 PM, Francis J. Lacoste wrote:
On 11-12-22 01:29 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
Alert:
The yellow squad has a db branch that needs to be landed asap
when we return (r11239 of db-stable). We are accumulating
branches that depend
- What's the current policy for deleting old OOPSes? If they are not
kept forever, we need to change our bug reporting policies somehow.
- On a related note, any idea why the OOPS mentioned in this bug does
not exist? https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/899123 -
Thanks Rob. I agree with your general observations. We have wondered
if a larger rethinking of our modeling would lead to a better design,
eventually. We've even tried to do some of that rethinking in our
discussions about this topic.
That said, the discussions led to this proposal. I am
On Dec 7, 2011, at 6:46 PM, William Grant wrote:
On 08/12/11 03:50, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:40:43PM +, Julian Edwards wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 22:00:39 Colin Watson wrote:
Could a Launchpad developer review this lot and copy into the Launchpad
PPA?
On Nov 22, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Ian Booth wrote:
Hi all
The Purple Assassins are working on the disclosure feature and a large
part of that is the managing disclosure LEP
(https://dev.launchpad.net/LEP/ManagingDisclosure). Because this work
involves the development of a fairly complex new
This looks like the same problem that currently has us in testfix.
https://lpbuildbot.canonical.com/builders/lucid_lp/builds/1559/steps/shell_6/logs/summary
Gary
On Nov 16, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Abel Deuring wrote:
Hi all,
Running ec2 land for lp:~adeuring/launchpad/bug-sorting-2 , I'm
suite is a real drag, of
course, but we're on the trail.
Gary
On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Jeroen Vermeulen wrote:
On 2011-11-16 21:49, Gary Poster wrote:
This looks like the same problem that currently has us in testfix.
https://lpbuildbot.canonical.com/builders/lucid_lp/builds/1559/steps
On Nov 16, 2011, at 5:28 PM, Brad Crittenden wrote:
...
Code inspection of these four revisions didn't reveal anything suspicious.
At Gary's suggestion I created four branches, each that reverted one of the
revisions. Running through ec2 the branch reverting r14301 passed and the
other
On Nov 16, 2011, at 8:58 PM, Martin Pool m...@sourcefrog.net wrote:
I filed this yesterday: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/891028
The way getUniqueInteger is implemented using both only per-thread
uniqueness, and also counting on pseudorandom integers to be unique
looks pretty
On Oct 30, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@canonical.com
wrote:
I didn't look at the which specific tests were triggering the problem, but
in general, yeah, this suite tests the testing machinery itself, so it wants
On Oct 31, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@canonical.com wrote:
I have a couple of concerns about that approach (which in fact is what I
tried initially with yuixhr).
The first is that the main testprocess has no visibility
On Oct 17, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Aaron Bentley aa...@canonical.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I've just given Launchpad the ability to render a given template either
server-side or client-side. I've
On Oct 7, 2011, at 10:06 AM, Danilo Šegan wrote:
У сре, 05. 10 2011. у 11:02 -0400, curtis Hovey пише:
Prefixes are unneeded, search support all or any tags.
But that provides no useful hierarchy between tags. If I just typed
code- to get all code-hosting related tags, they might speak
Sorry, for some reason this has been sitting around unsent. I wondered why no
one had replied! :-P So anyway...
On Oct 4, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Aaron Bentley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-10-04 05:54 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
Actually thats a lie, this mail is
On Oct 2, 2011, at 6:06 PM, James Westby wrote:
Hi Brad,
Thanks for writing this up. It reminded of another bug to do with
validators and dict ordering:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lazr.restful/+bug/561521
I'm not sure if there are changes that could be made to avoid these
sorts of
Hello all.
Yesterday I landed code to write and run YUI XHR tests. This was an effort
that began at the Dublin sprint with Francis, Curtis, Deryck, Steve, and
myself. It had been put aside for awhile, and I brought it to completion.
This is intended to be the replacement for our Windmill
lp.testing.StormStatementRecorder now has a few more features, making it
interesting for interactive use. The below is taken from the wiki
(https://dev.launchpad.net/Debugging).
Sometimes you want to look at the SQL of just a certain slice of code, such as
within make harness. The
On Sep 12, 2011, at 8:17 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@canonical.com
wrote:
I would expect: ./setup.py sdist upload --signed
and in lp make a 'release' and upload the files there as well. I
believe sinzui has some automation around
On Sep 13, 2011, at 8:41 AM, Benji York wrote:
In the long run we should change the way downloads are
presented if we want people to use LP to host Python packages.
Otherwise we should move the lazr package downloads to PyPI.
We should have the primary download be in PyPI for Python packages,
On Sep 9, 2011, at 4:49 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
rabbitfixture is a lp team project, so it would be better to merge his
branch do a release and update to the new release, than to run a
side-branch of something we maintain :)
Perhaps thats what you meant, in which case, ignore me!
Yeah, I
On Sep 12, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Sep 9, 2011, at 4:49 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
rabbitfixture is a lp team project, so it would be better to merge his
branch do a release and update
William's branch worked for me too. I'm going to change Launchpad to use it,
so others don't have to mess with this.
Gary
On Sep 5, 2011, at 7:31 PM, William Grant wrote:
On 05/09/11 21:31, Jeroen Vermeulen wrote:
On 2011-09-05 17:22, William Grant wrote:
As it happens, I solved this
On Aug 30, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Jonathan Lange wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@canonical.com
wrote:
I believe this is affecting other ec2 users. I dug into it with abentley's
help. It's a bug in bzrlib (symptom details are in
http://pastebin.ubuntu.com
On Aug 24, 2011, at 7:05 AM, Julian Edwards wrote:
\o/
Awesome! Thanks Gary. Did you put this on the dev wiki anywhere?
It was already mentioned on https://dev.launchpad.net/Debugging but it was a
bit out of date. I just updated and gardened that page. The new features are
described
The good news: yes, I had an old ec2 command that didn't know the StevenK now
was blessed to provide AMIs. Once I did that, the exception I quoted stopped.
The bad news: I still have a lot of other exceptions I didn't mention. They
all look like this.
and fix for bzr, make an MP, and make a Launchpad egg.
Gary
On Aug 26, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
The good news: yes, I had an old ec2 command that didn't know the StevenK now
was blessed to provide AMIs. Once I did that, the exception I quoted stopped.
The bad news: I still
Cool, thank you Stuart.
I've linked the incident report to the bug.
Gary
On Aug 24, 2011, at 11:36 PM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@canonical.com
wrote:
Hi Stuart. When working on
https://wiki.canonical.com/IncidentReports/2011-08-19-LP
Looks like we are about to have a buildbot failure. This is caused because I
submitted a branch with passing tests that relied on the branches that Aaron
reverted for bug 833787. I'm going to revert my branch and submit it as a
testfix.
Gary
___
This is done.
Gary
On Aug 25, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
Looks like we are about to have a buildbot failure. This is caused because I
submitted a branch with passing tests that relied on the branches that Aaron
reverted for bug 833787. I'm going to revert my branch and submit
Hey. Anyone see failures like this in ec2? Any ideas on the problem? I can't
dupe this locally. If no-one has any ideas I'll dive into a running ec
instance tomorrow.
Thanks
Gary
FAILURE:
lp.archiveuploader.tests.test_uploadprocessor.TestUploadProcessor.testXZDebUpload
On Aug 22, 2011, at 6:10 AM, Gavin Panella wrote:
Is there a reusable way to test security proxies?
I've partially done it by hand in some WIP code* but it's the kind of
thing for which I suspect someone else has already come up with a
better solution.
* http://goo.gl/AAmfn, line 532
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
