On 29/05/12 20:06, Jonathan Lange wrote:
> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Stuart Bishop
> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Devs will need to switch over to PostgreSQL 9.1 - our first landing
>> is happening with sampledata generated from PG 9.1. As usual,
>> sampledata diffs are huge when generated by diffe
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Stuart Bishop
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Devs will need to switch over to PostgreSQL 9.1 - our first landing
> is happening with sampledata generated from PG 9.1. As usual,
> sampledata diffs are huge when generated by different PostgreSQL
> versions so to avoid unnecessary
On 05/08/2012 02:11 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Gary Poster wrote:
>
>> Stuart, thank you for the alert. When is production scheduled to switch
>> to 9.1?
>
> It isn't scheduled yet. Everything is ready to go, but we are just
> waiting on everyone to wind down aft
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Gary Poster wrote:
> Stuart, thank you for the alert. When is production scheduled to switch
> to 9.1?
It isn't scheduled yet. Everything is ready to go, but we are just
waiting on everyone to wind down after the release and be comfortable
with this sort of upgra
On 05/06/2012 06:16 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Devs will need to switch over to PostgreSQL 9.1 - our first landing
> is happening with sampledata generated from PG 9.1. As usual,
> sampledata diffs are huge when generated by different PostgreSQL
> versions so to avoid unnecessary huge com
Hi.
Devs will need to switch over to PostgreSQL 9.1 - our first landing
is happening with sampledata generated from PG 9.1. As usual,
sampledata diffs are huge when generated by different PostgreSQL
versions so to avoid unnecessary huge commits (>1MB) we all need to be
running the same version fr
6 matches
Mail list logo
