Hi Karl,
> I don't think that's what happened. I think he saw the page, but at the
> time, the information he needed wasn't there (remember, I just put it
> there yesterday :-) ).
exactly. :-) I wasn't aware of the intention why LaunchPad has been
open sourced, and the web site missed the inform
Andrea Corbellini writes:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 11:02 -0400, Karl Fogel wrote:
>> I think repeating the same information on different pages is likely to
>> lead to inconsistency later... And anyone looking to self-host is going
>> to start at the Building and Running page.
>
> Well, maybe that'
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 11:02 -0400, Karl Fogel wrote:
> I think repeating the same information on different pages is likely to
> lead to inconsistency later... And anyone looking to self-host is going
> to start at the Building and Running page.
Well, maybe that's right. But IIRC this discussion is
Andrea Corbellini writes:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 01:57 -0400, Karl Fogel wrote:
>> Well, I'm reluctant to use precious front page real estate on that.
>> Instead, I've put some text on https://dev.launchpad.net/Running, in the
>> first section, on the theory that anyone looking for information ab
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 01:57 -0400, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Well, I'm reluctant to use precious front page real estate on that.
> Instead, I've put some text on https://dev.launchpad.net/Running, in the
> first section, on the theory that anyone looking for information about
> running an instance would
Hello Karl,
> From my announcement when we released the code [1]:
well... the problem is, that in the two other announcements (the ones
you linked in your reply), there has been no mention of this. Not
everyone is subscribed to the -users mailing lists, and when relying
on the blog and the PR, it
Florian Effenberger writes:
> well, maybe I got it wrong, but when the first announcements that
> LaunchPad will be open sourced reached the public, I had the
> impression that it will be suitable for own hosting, i.e.
> ready-to-deploy packages, stable releases and no hassles when putting
> it on
Hi Karl,
> Hmmm, okay. Can you give me a hint as to where you would have expected
> to see it? Then we'll be able to put it in exactly the right place :-).
> (I don't want to just put it in lots of places -- wikis already tend to
> have repetitive repetition syndrome.)
well, maybe I got it wron
Florian Effenberger writes:
>> My wording wasn't clear at all, sorry. What I meant was: the open
>> source distribution of Launchpad's code is meant to help improve
>> Launchpad.net.
>>
>> Launchpad.net itself is meant for production use, of course: to help
>> free software projects and operating
Hi Karl,
> My wording wasn't clear at all, sorry. What I meant was: the open
> source distribution of Launchpad's code is meant to help improve
> Launchpad.net.
>
> Launchpad.net itself is meant for production use, of course: to help
> free software projects and operating system distributions (li
Robert Collins writes:
> Should that be linked from the FAQ?
It's not been that much of a FAQ so far, really, but go ahead if you
want to.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscrib
Karl Fogel writes:
> Florian Effenberger writes:
>> thanks for the fast reply! I see... I thought LaunchPad was also
>> offered for production use but now I get the point that it is mainly
>> meant for developers. :-) Thanks for the fast help!
>
> Yes, in the sense that it's mainly meant to help
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 23:43 -0400, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Florian Effenberger writes:
> > thanks for the fast reply! I see... I thought LaunchPad was also
> > offered for production use but now I get the point that it is mainly
> > meant for developers. :-) Thanks for the fast help!
>
> Yes, in the
Florian Effenberger writes:
> thanks for the fast reply! I see... I thought LaunchPad was also
> offered for production use but now I get the point that it is mainly
> meant for developers. :-) Thanks for the fast help!
Yes, in the sense that it's mainly meant to help users of launchpad.net
impro
Hi,
thanks for the fast reply! I see... I thought LaunchPad was also
offered for production use but now I get the point that it is mainly
meant for developers. :-) Thanks for the fast help!
Florian
2009/10/25 Robert Collins :
> On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 13:36 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
>> Hel
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 13:36 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a second question regarding LaunchPad. As said, compiling it
> out of the sources worked well thanks to the help of the mailing list.
> However, I'm not convinced that for a production site, the open source
> edition
Hello,
I have a second question regarding LaunchPad. As said, compiling it
out of the sources worked well thanks to the help of the mailing list.
However, I'm not convinced that for a production site, the open source
edition is the right choice. Are there any stable branches or upgrade
paths that
17 matches
Mail list logo
