Re: Necessary to make strange tweaks to my array data pointers when calling dlls

Thanks David, Rolf, and Greg for all the input on this rather esoteric topic. I still have issues regarding this topic, but I don't know that I can formulate them into pointed questions. In any case, the dll calls work, and that's what matters in the end. What I DO know is that - thanks to you g

Re: Necessary to make strange tweaks to my array data pointers when

Thanks, Greg. Yes, I've been "flattening" a cluster to pass it to the function. Sorry for not using this bit of LV nomenclature earlier. My wording must have made things confusing. Let's continue getting the record straight. (Sorry David and Rolf, perhaps this will clarify things for you guys).

Re: Necessary to make strange tweaks to my array data pointers when calling dlls

Thanks, David, You've answered my question. If you don't mind carrying on this discussion just a little further, though, you've brought up one more question... You pointed out that depending on which calling convention you use, either the function or the calling code pops parameters off the stac

Necessary to make strange tweaks to my array data pointers when calling dlls

In building pointers to be passed to certain dll calls, I have noticed that I need to pay attention to some peculiar details if I want the functions to execute properly. Namely, numeric types must have their bytes reversed from the way in which LabVIEW orders them (least-significant last) before b