Hi,
For this type of resolution (30 seconds), I see absolutely no problem
with getting the desired results. Although the operating system may
decide not to give LabVIEW the CPU immediately, it almost certainly
would be within 30 seconds if there are plenty of system resources and
not many program
You can always use a smaller wait (either wait or Wait Until Next ms
Multiple) in a loop so your VI does not lock up (no response from
clicks), and count how long the vi is in idle. It should be acurate
enough (within 30 seoncds out of 19 minutes).
If you use event in your VI, then simply wire 19
I don't know about accuracy, but I noticed something funny last week
while running a program.
I have a program which communicates over RS-232 and I need to make
pauses now and then. After sending a few commands, I set the VI to
wait for 20 minutes (120 ms). If I call the 20 minutes, half the
Howdy all,
There was a similar earlier post asking about wait accuracy over small
periods:
http://exchange.ni.com/servlet/ProcessRequest?RHIVEID=101&RPAGEID=135&HOID=5065000800D4A2&UCATEGORY_0=_49_%24_6_&UCATEGORY_S=0&USEARCHCONTEXT_QUESTION_0=Accuracy+of+Wait+Function&USEARCHCONTEXT_
