Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Kathy
It appears that extralegal factors will always make a difference in who is a
"worthy" person to argue they should be saved. You have hit on two
important ones, IMO.
jackief
Kathy E wrote:
> Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> So where'
Leonard Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
At 12:12 PM 3/30/1998 -0500, you wrote:
>Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>So where's the outrage? Where was the press? Why no interviews on TV?
>This lady had the same criteria as Tucker did, oh except for one thing
>she wasn't as young or as pre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Kathy,
The number of coincidences that one has to swallow to believe Judy Buenoano
was innocent are mind-boggling no doubt. When she argued she had to prove
her innocence it was hardly far from the mark. One of the great bete-noires
of the Simpson case surfaced in
Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Terry :)
Well she won't be confessing since they executed her this morning. Yet I
did see "The New Detectives" profile her bombing case and I was
convinced by the evidence that she did it. I am just surprised how
silent people were about this case. Both he
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>So where's the outrage? Where was the press? Why no interviews on TV?
>This lady had the same criteria as Tucker did, oh except for one thing
>she wasn't as young or as pretty. Is that what a women needs to get
>those against th
Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So where's the outrage? Where was the press? Why no interviews on TV?
This lady had the same criteria as Tucker did, oh except for one thing
she wasn't as young or as pretty. Is that what a women needs to get
those against the death penalty to notice her? I'm
