Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue
Couldn't agree with you more. I really liked how he showed both sides of the
issue--the lack of support for the police (financially, socially, etc.) in their
efforts and the lack of knowledge of why the emergence of such gangs--or rather, not
k
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Jackie:
I might give them an idea of what is real, that is for sure. It
certainly isn't like any television show. :(
I thought it really gave an inside story of why these kids (adults)
became gang members, etc too. Made me understand it a lot more.
Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue
I think his explanations fell right in line with what a number of researchers
are finding. Everyone wants approval and support--if they can't find it
elsewhere, gangs fill the bill nicely. It has everything going--rituals,
special names, feeli
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Jackie:
What did you think of some of the explainations for gang activity and
the spread of it? It made a lot of sense to me.
Glad you liked it. :)
Sue
>
> Hi Sue
>
> Guess she will have to do the talk show circuit. (I know, be nice).
>
> Off
Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue
Guess she will have to do the talk show circuit. (I know, be nice).
Off topic: I am just about done with the book. It is great. I really
like the writer's style. He brings a lot of other material in that really
gives you a picture of what
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The Judge is throwing out the entire Paula Jones case according to CBS
Sue
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-
