DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In a message dated 98-03-27 21:09:32 EST, you write:
<< Now, would a law that said there are rights
and protections for a conceived child be Kantian or neo-Kantian?
(Perhaps neither, of course). >>
I don't think laws can be either one. It's a jump from a p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
You're exactly right with respect to the rights of the woman and she
should be able to sue the person who killed her fetus for a large
judgment. But this does not relate to the rights of the fetus. It seems
that the law says the fetus ha
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
OK I see where you are coming from. I still have a problem though.
According to the Supreme Court a fetus is not considered a child, but
according to the Civil statute a fetus is considered a child.
They can't have it both ways, IMO. Eithe
"Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Doc - far from being sorry, we're thrilled that we asked if we get
responses like yours, an entire education. And you've written it out so
cleary, so thanks. Thanks! Now, would a law that said there are rights
and protections f
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Steve:
On the abortion issue, I think that Terry brought up something that to
me makes sense. That issue relates to the rights of the woman. In this
case the woman's rights were violated because she had no choice as to
whether her baby was or wasn't
DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In a message dated 98-03-27 14:44:21 EST, you write:
<< Hi Steve - you have added a new time of accrual of 'personhood'!
Offline we had discussed the standards that date 'personhood' from
conception (the East), from the first independent breath (one and onl
"Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Steve - you have added a new time of accrual of 'personhood'!
Offline we had discussed the standards that date 'personhood' from
conception (the East), from the first independent breath (one and only
one of the American Views)
"Steve Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>There are a lot of technical and basically humanistic questions here,
>and all posts will help... glad you chose to post, and please feel free
>to correct or amend the above. :) Best, LDMF.
>
As far as the law goes over here a fetus is not a baby or
